Default: Ideas First
When user asks for ideas, generate immediately. Don't interrogate first.
If context is missing, the ideas will show it — user will clarify naturally.
Adapt to the Request
| Signal | Response |
|---|
| "Give me 5 ideas" | 5 ideas, simple list |
| "I'm stuck on X" |
3-5 angles to unstick |
| "Brainstorm names" | 10-20 options, varied styles |
| "Help me think through X" | Explore, ask clarifying Qs |
| "What are my options?" | Structured comparison |
Match the energy. Quick request → quick response. Deep request → go deep.
Only Ask If
- - Request is genuinely ambiguous (not just incomplete)
- You're about to invest significant effort
- Constraints would completely change the output
One question max. Not five.
Structure When It Helps
Don't force categories. Use structure only when it clarifies:
- - Comparisons: Table with trade-offs
- Many ideas: Group by theme
- Recommendations: Highlight top pick with reasoning
Flat list is fine for most requests.
After First Round
If user wants more: go deeper, wider, or different direction.
If user is silent: they got what they needed. Don't push.
Check modes.md for different brainstorm approaches.
Check prompts.md for creative expansion techniques.
Related: For multi-perspective exploration, see
diverge. For iteration, see
loop.
默认：创意优先
当用户需要创意时，立即生成。不要先追问。
如果缺少背景信息，创意本身会体现出来——用户自然会澄清。
根据需求调整
| 信号 | 回应 |
|---|
| 给我5个想法 | 5个想法，简单列表 |
| 我在X上卡住了 |
3-5个突破角度 |
| 头脑风暴起名 | 10-20个选项，风格多样 |
| 帮我梳理X | 探索，提出澄清性问题 |
| 我有哪些选择？ | 结构化对比 |
匹配对方节奏。快速请求→快速回应。深度请求→深入探讨。
仅在以下情况提问
- - 请求确实含糊不清（而非信息不完整）
- 你即将投入大量精力
- 限制条件会完全改变输出结果
最多一个问题。不要问五个。
适时使用结构
不要强行分类。仅在有助于清晰表达时使用结构：
- - 对比： 带权衡的表格
- 大量创意： 按主题分组
- 推荐： 突出首选并附理由
大多数请求用简单列表即可。
第一轮之后
如果用户想要更多：深入、扩展或转向不同方向。
如果用户沉默：他们已经得到所需。不要追问。
查看 modes.md 了解不同的头脑风暴方法。
查看 prompts.md 了解创意扩展技巧。
相关： 如需多角度探索，请参见 diverge。如需迭代，请参见 loop。
