Compensation
Structured guidance for offers, pay, and negotiation (not legal or tax advice): confirm triggers, propose the stages below, and adapt if the user wants a lighter pass.
When to Offer This Workflow
Trigger conditions:
- - User mentions negotiation, offers, raises, compensation, or closely related work
- They want a structured workflow rather than ad-hoc tips
- They are preparing a review, rollout, or stakeholder communication
Initial offer:
Explain the four stages briefly and ask whether to follow this workflow or work freeform. If they decline, continue in their preferred style.
Workflow Stages
Stage 1: Clarify context & goals
Anchor on market context and priorities. Ask what success looks like, constraints, and what must not break. Capture unknowns early.
Stage 2: Design or plan the approach
Translate goals into a concrete plan around total comp components. Compare alternatives and explicit trade-offs; avoid implicit assumptions.
Stage 3: Implement, validate, and harden
Execute with verification loops tied to negotiation script and BATNA. Prefer small steps, measurable checks, and rollback points where risk is high.
Stage 4: Operate, communicate, and iterate
Close the loop with written follow-ups: monitoring, documentation, stakeholder updates, and lessons learned for the next cycle.
Checklist Before Completion
- - Goals and constraints are explicit for compensation discussions
- Risks and trade-offs are stated, not hand-waved
- Verification steps match the change’s impact (tests, canary, peer review)
- Operational follow-through is covered (monitoring, docs, owners)
Tips for Effective Guidance
- - Be procedural: stage-by-stage, with clear exit criteria
- Ask for missing context (environment, scale, deadlines) before prescribing
- Prefer checklists and concrete examples over generic platitudes
- If the user declines the workflow, switch to freeform help without lecturing
Handling Deviations
- - If the user wants to skip a stage: confirm and continue with what they need.
- If context is missing: ask targeted questions before strong recommendations.
- Prefer concrete examples, trade-offs, and verification steps over generic advice.
Quality Bar
- - Each recommendation should be actionable (what to do next).
- Call out failure modes relevant to compensation talks (relationship risk, miscommunication, or unrealistic asks).
- Keep tone direct and respectful of the user’s time.
薪酬
关于录用、薪酬与谈判的结构化指导(非法律或税务建议):确认触发条件,提出以下阶段,若用户希望简化流程则灵活调整。
何时提供此工作流
触发条件:
- - 用户提及谈判、录用、加薪、薪酬或密切相关内容
- 用户希望获得结构化工作流而非零散建议
- 用户正在准备评估、推行或利益相关方沟通
初始提议:
简要说明四个阶段,询问用户是否遵循此工作流或自由讨论。若用户拒绝,则按其偏好方式继续。
工作流阶段
第一阶段:明确背景与目标
以市场背景和优先级为基础。明确成功标准、约束条件及不可突破的底线。尽早识别未知因素。
第二阶段:设计或规划方案
将目标转化为围绕整体薪酬要素的具体计划。对比备选方案并明确权衡取舍,避免隐含假设。
第三阶段:实施、验证与强化
通过谈判脚本和最佳替代方案的验证循环执行。优先采用小步骤、可量化检查及高风险场景的回滚节点。
第四阶段:运营、沟通与迭代
通过书面跟进形成闭环:监控、文档记录、利益相关方更新及下一周期的经验总结。
完成前检查清单
- - 薪酬讨论的目标与约束条件明确
- 风险与权衡已明确陈述,而非含糊带过
- 验证步骤与变更影响相匹配(测试、灰度发布、同行评审)
- 运营跟进已覆盖(监控、文档、负责人)
有效指导建议
- - 按流程推进:分阶段进行,明确退出标准
- 在提出建议前先询问缺失背景(环境、规模、截止日期)
- 优先使用检查清单和具体案例,避免泛泛而谈
- 若用户拒绝工作流,转为自由协助,不进行说教
偏差处理
- - 若用户希望跳过某阶段:确认后按其需求继续
- 若背景信息缺失:在给出强有力建议前先提出针对性问题
- 优先提供具体案例、权衡取舍和验证步骤,而非通用建议
质量标准
- - 每项建议应具备可操作性(明确下一步行动)
- 指出与薪酬谈判相关的失败模式(关系风险、沟通失误或不切实际的要求)
- 保持语气直接,尊重用户时间