Setup
On first use, read setup.md for integration guidelines.
When to Use
User needs competitive intelligence. Agent tracks competitors, monitors changes, analyzes positioning, and maintains strategic dossiers with pricing, features, and market moves.
Architecture
Memory lives in ~/competitor-monitoring/. See memory-template.md for structure.
CODEBLOCK0
Quick Reference
| Topic | File |
|---|
| Setup process | INLINECODE3 |
| Memory template |
memory-template.md |
Core Rules
1. Check Dossiers Before Acting
Before any competitor question, load the relevant
competitors/{company}.md file. Build on existing intelligence, don't start fresh each time.
2. Track These Signals
| Signal | Where to Look | Impact |
|---|
| Pricing changes | Pricing page, announcements | Direct competitive threat |
| New features |
Changelog, blog, social | Capability gap/parity |
| Positioning shifts | Homepage copy, ads | Market narrative |
| Hiring patterns | Jobs page, LinkedIn | Strategic direction |
| Funding/acquisitions | News, Crunchbase | Resource changes |
3. Alert Priorities
- - Critical: Pricing undercut, feature that blocks your advantage
- High: Major feature launch, positioning change
- Medium: Blog posts, minor updates, team changes
- Low: Social activity, routine content
4. Maintain Signal-to-Noise
Don't report everything. Only surface changes that require action or awareness. If nothing actionable happened, say so.
5. Compare Objectively
When analyzing competitors, be honest about their strengths. Acknowledge where they're ahead. False confidence leads to bad strategy.
Framework:
CODEBLOCK1
6. Update Dossiers Proactively
After any research or mention of a competitor, update their dossier. Don't wait for explicit instructions.
7. Connect to Strategy
Every observation should connect to "so what?" What does this mean for user's positioning, roadmap, or priorities?
Template:
CODEBLOCK2
Monitoring Patterns
Regular Check-ins
CODEBLOCK3
Trigger-Based
- - User mentions competitor → refresh dossier
- Industry news → check all relevant competitors
- User launches feature → compare to competitor alternatives
Competitor Dossier Structure
Each competitors/{company}.md contains:
- - Company overview (what they do, target market)
- Pricing (current, historical changes)
- Features (core, recent additions)
- Positioning (messaging, differentiation)
- Strengths (honest assessment)
- Weaknesses (opportunities to exploit)
- Recent moves (last 90 days)
- Watch list (what to monitor)
Analysis Types
Head-to-Head
Compare user vs one competitor. Feature matrix, pricing, positioning.
CODEBLOCK4
Landscape
Map all competitors by segment. Who's premium, who's cheap, who's niche.
CODEBLOCK5
Trend
How is the competitive space evolving? What's the direction?
- - Watch for: New entrants, funding rounds, pivots, acquisitions
- Pattern recognition: Are competitors moving upmarket? Going vertical?
Gap
Where are opportunities nobody's addressing?
- - Underserved segments
- Features everyone complains about but nobody fixes
- Adjacent markets competitors ignore
Common Traps
- - Vanity metrics obsession → Tracking social followers instead of pricing/features. Social numbers don't predict competitive moves.
- Confirmation bias → Ignoring competitor strengths because you don't want to see them. Honest assessment beats false confidence.
- Information overload → Reporting every blog post and tweet. Filter for actionable signals, not noise.
- Stale dossiers → Intelligence from 6 months ago is worse than no intelligence. Update after every mention.
- Missing indirect competitors → Watching direct rivals but ignoring substitutes. Spreadsheets compete with project management tools.
- Reactive only → Only checking competitors when something breaks. Proactive monitoring catches threats early.
- Single source → Only watching their website. Combine: pricing page, changelog, blog, jobs, social, reviews.
Security & Privacy
Data that stays local:
- - All competitor dossiers stored in INLINECODE7
- Analysis reports and alert history
- User preferences and monitoring settings
What happens on first use:
- - Creates folder
~/competitor-monitoring/ with your data - Asks how you want monitoring to work (proactive vs on-demand)
This skill does NOT:
- - Access competitor internal systems
- Scrape data in violation of ToS
- Store credentials or sensitive tokens
- Send your data externally
Related Skills
Install with
clawhub install <slug> if user confirms:
- -
market-research — broader market analysis - INLINECODE11 — strategic frameworks
- INLINECODE12 — data analysis patterns
Feedback
- - If useful: INLINECODE13
- Stay updated: INLINECODE14
设置
首次使用时,请阅读 setup.md 获取集成指南。
使用时机
用户需要竞争情报。代理追踪竞争对手、监控变化、分析定位,并维护包含定价、功能和市场动态的战略档案。
架构
数据存储在 ~/competitor-monitoring/ 目录中。结构参见 memory-template.md。
~/competitor-monitoring/
├── memory.md # 状态 + 偏好 + 活跃竞争对手
├── competitors/ # 单个档案
│ ├── {company}.md # 每个竞争对手的情报
│ └── ...
├── alerts/ # 触发的警报
│ └── YYYY-MM-DD.md # 每日警报日志
└── analysis/ # 战略分析
└── {topic}.md # 对比报告
快速参考
memory-template.md |
核心规则
1. 行动前先检查档案
在回答任何竞争对手问题前,先加载相关的 competitors/{company}.md 文件。基于已有情报进行扩展,不要每次都从头开始。
2. 追踪以下信号
| 信号 | 查看位置 | 影响 |
|---|
| 定价变化 | 定价页面、公告 | 直接竞争威胁 |
| 新功能 |
更新日志、博客、社交媒体 | 能力差距/对等 |
| 定位转变 | 首页文案、广告 | 市场叙事 |
| 招聘模式 | 招聘页面、领英 | 战略方向 |
| 融资/收购 | 新闻、Crunchbase | 资源变化 |
3. 警报优先级
- - 严重: 定价低于你、推出阻碍你优势的功能
- 高: 重大功能发布、定位变化
- 中: 博客文章、小更新、团队变动
- 低: 社交媒体活动、常规内容
4. 保持信噪比
不要报告所有内容。只呈现需要采取行动或关注的变化。如果没有可操作的事件,就如实说明。
5. 客观比较
分析竞争对手时,要诚实评价他们的优势。承认他们领先的地方。虚假自信会导致糟糕的战略。
框架:
针对每个竞争对手,诚实回答:
- - 他们在哪些方面比我们强?
- 他们的客户喜欢什么而我们没有?
- 如果我是客户,我为什么会选择他们?
6. 主动更新档案
在每次研究或提及竞争对手后,更新其档案。不要等待明确指示。
7. 关联战略
每个观察结果都应关联到所以呢?这对用户的定位、路线图或优先级意味着什么?
模板:
观察:竞争对手X推出了功能Y
所以呢:这意味着...
→ 对我们的路线图:[加速/降级/忽略]
→ 对定位:[调整信息传递/加倍投入/无变化]
→ 对销售:[新异议/新优势/中性]
监控模式
定期检查
每周:扫描定价页面、首页、更新日志
每月:深入分析定位、功能对比
每季度:全面竞争格局审查
触发式
- - 用户提及竞争对手 → 刷新档案
- 行业新闻 → 检查所有相关竞争对手
- 用户发布功能 → 与竞争对手替代方案对比
竞争对手档案结构
每个 competitors/{company}.md 包含:
- - 公司概况(业务范围、目标市场)
- 定价(当前、历史变化)
- 功能(核心、近期新增)
- 定位(信息传递、差异化)
- 优势(诚实评估)
- 劣势(可利用的机会)
- 近期动态(最近90天)
- 观察清单(需监控的内容)
分析类型
一对一对比
比较用户与一个竞争对手。功能矩阵、定价、定位。
用户 vs Acme公司:
- - 定价:同等功能我们便宜40%
- 功能:他们有X,我们有Y(差异化)
- 定位:他们瞄准企业,我们瞄准中小企业
→ 我们的切入点:为小团队提供更简单、更便宜的方案
格局分析
按细分市场绘制所有竞争对手。谁高端、谁廉价、谁专注小众。
市场地图(示例):
├── 高端($500+/月):BigCorp、EnterpriseCo
├── 中端($100-500):竞争对手A、竞争对手B
├── 中小企业($20-100):我们、StartupX
└── 免费/增值:OpenSourceY
→ 空白:没有人占据专业但实惠的定位
趋势分析
竞争格局如何演变?方向是什么?
- - 关注:新进入者、融资轮次、转型、收购
- 模式识别:竞争对手是否在向高端市场移动?是否在垂直化?
空白分析
哪些机会尚未被满足?
- - 服务不足的细分市场
- 人人抱怨但无人修复的功能
- 竞争对手忽视的相邻市场
常见陷阱
- - 沉迷虚荣指标 → 追踪社交媒体粉丝而非定价/功能。社交数据无法预测竞争动向。
- 确认偏误 → 因不愿看到而忽视竞争对手的优势。诚实评估胜过虚假自信。
- 信息过载 → 报告每篇博客文章和推文。筛选可操作的信号,而非噪音。
- 档案过时 → 6个月前的情报比没有情报更糟。每次提及后立即更新。
- 忽略间接竞争对手 → 只关注直接对手而忽视替代品。电子表格与项目管理工具存在竞争。
- 仅被动应对 → 只在出问题时才检查竞争对手。主动监控能及早发现威胁。
- 单一信息来源 → 只关注他们的网站。综合:定价页面、更新日志、博客、招聘、社交媒体、评论。
安全与隐私
本地存储的数据:
- - 所有竞争对手档案存储在 ~/competitor-monitoring/
- 分析报告和警报历史
- 用户偏好和监控设置
首次使用时:
- - 创建 ~/competitor-monitoring/ 文件夹存放你的数据
- 询问你希望监控如何工作(主动 vs 按需)
此技能不会:
- - 访问竞争对手内部系统
- 违反服务条款抓取数据
- 存储凭证或敏感令牌
- 将你的数据发送到外部
相关技能
如果用户确认,使用 clawhub install
安装:
- - market-research — 更广泛的市场分析
- business — 战略框架
- analytics — 数据分析模式
反馈
- - 如果觉得有用:clawhub star competitor-monitoring
- 保持更新:clawhub sync