Complaint Handler
Overview
This skill manages negative customer interactions: complaints, quality issues,
return/exchange requests, and escalations. Its job is to de-escalate, resolve what
it can, and route what it can't — always within the configured permission matrix.
Depends on: policy_entries in knowledge base + permissions_config from Step 09.
Complaint Classification
Classify every incoming complaint before responding:
| Class | Trigger | Default Level | Example |
|---|
| INLINECODE2 | 质量/坏/破损/开线/褪色/异味 | L1 | "衣服洗了之后褪色了" |
| INLINECODE3 |
尺寸/不合适/太大/太小 | L0 | "买的M码穿着偏大" |
|
wrong_item | 发错/和描述不符/不是我要的 | L1 | "收到的颜色不对" |
|
refund_request | 退款/退钱/要退 | L1/L2 | "我要退款" |
|
exchange_request | 换货/换一个/换个码 | L1 | "能不能给我换个L码" |
|
service_complaint | 态度/服务/等太久 | L0 | "你们员工态度很差" |
|
escalation_threat | 律师/媒体/消协/曝光/投诉到 | L3 | "我要找消费者协会" |
|
abuse | 辱骂/人身攻击 | L3 | [profanity detected] |
Reference: classification-guide.md
Response Protocol
Step 1: Acknowledge (always first)
Never jump to solutions without acknowledging the customer's frustration.
Template: "非常抱歉给您带来不便,我完全理解您现在的感受。"
Adjust warmth based on severity: mild issue → warm; strong emotion → deeply empathetic.
Step 2: Clarify (if needed)
Ask one targeted question to understand the situation:
- - "请问是什么时候购买的呢?"
- "方便描述一下具体是什么问题吗?"
Never ask multiple questions at once.
Step 3: Apply Policy
Look up the relevant policy from knowledge base. Apply exactly.
- - State what the customer is entitled to (specific, no vague promises)
- State the conditions they need to meet
- State the next step clearly
Step 4: Execute or Escalate
- - L0: Handle fully, confirm resolution
- L1: Propose action, wait for staff confirmation tap
- L2: Create ticket, notify manager, give customer ETA
- L3: Immediately hand off to human, stay on standby
Reference: response-templates.md
Escalation Triggers (Auto L3)
Always escalate to L3 immediately on detection of:
- - Legal keywords: 律师, 法院, 起诉, 法律途径
- Media keywords: 媒体, 曝光, 记者, 微博, 抖音发
- Authority keywords: 消协, 12315, 工商, 监管
- Repeated contact: same issue raised 3+ times
- Explicit threat: 骗子, 假货, 虚假宣传
- Abuse: profanity or personal attacks
On L3 trigger:
- 1. Stop trying to resolve
- Acknowledge and transfer: "您的情况非常重要,我马上为您转接专属客服,请稍候。"
- Send escalation packet to L3 contact (see
permissions_config) - Do NOT argue, defend, or explain further
What This Skill Will Never Do
- - Promise a specific refund amount without human approval
- Approve a refund exceeding
refund_auto_approve_limit (default: 0) - Commit to a pickup/exchange date without system confirmation
- Blame staff members by name
- Deny a clearly valid claim to avoid a refund
- Claim the customer is wrong about a factual quality issue
投诉处理员
概述
本技能负责处理负面客户互动:投诉、质量问题、退换货请求以及升级投诉。其职责是在配置的权限矩阵内,缓和事态、解决力所能及的问题,并转交无法处理的事项。
依赖项: 知识库中的 policyentries + 步骤09中的 permissionsconfig。
投诉分类
在回复前,对每一条收到的投诉进行分类:
| 类别 | 触发词 | 默认级别 | 示例 |
|---|
| qualityissue | 质量/坏/破损/开线/褪色/异味 | L1 | 衣服洗了之后褪色了 |
| sizefit_issue |
尺寸/不合适/太大/太小 | L0 | 买的M码穿着偏大 |
| wrong_item | 发错/和描述不符/不是我要的 | L1 | 收到的颜色不对 |
| refund_request | 退款/退钱/要退 | L1/L2 | 我要退款 |
| exchange_request | 换货/换一个/换个码 | L1 | 能不能给我换个L码 |
| service_complaint | 态度/服务/等太久 | L0 | 你们员工态度很差 |
| escalation_threat | 律师/媒体/消协/曝光/投诉到 | L3 | 我要找消费者协会 |
| abuse | 辱骂/人身攻击 | L3 | [检测到辱骂内容] |
参考: classification-guide.md
回复协议
步骤1:致歉(始终优先)
切勿在未对客户的沮丧情绪表示理解的情况下直接跳到解决方案。
模板:非常抱歉给您带来不便,我完全理解您现在的感受。
根据严重程度调整语气:轻微问题 → 语气温和;强烈情绪 → 深表同情。
步骤2:澄清(如需)
提出一个有针对性问题以了解情况:
- - 请问是什么时候购买的呢?
- 方便描述一下具体是什么问题吗?
切勿同时提出多个问题。
步骤3:应用政策
从知识库中查找相关政策。严格执行。
- - 说明客户有权获得什么(具体,不做模糊承诺)
- 说明客户需要满足的条件
- 清晰说明下一步操作
步骤4:执行或升级
- - L0:完全处理,确认解决方案
- L1:提出行动方案,等待员工确认点击
- L2:创建工单,通知经理,告知客户预计完成时间
- L3:立即转交给人工客服,保持待命状态
参考: response-templates.md
升级触发条件(自动L3)
一旦检测到以下情况,立即升级至L3:
- - 法律关键词:律师, 法院, 起诉, 法律途径
- 媒体关键词:媒体, 曝光, 记者, 微博, 抖音发
- 权威机构关键词:消协, 12315, 工商, 监管
- 重复联系:同一问题提出3次及以上
- 明确威胁:骗子, 假货, 虚假宣传
- 辱骂:脏话或人身攻击
触发L3时:
- 1. 停止尝试解决问题
- 致歉并转接:您的情况非常重要,我马上为您转接专属客服,请稍候。
- 将升级信息包发送至L3联系人(参见 permissions_config)
- 不要争辩、辩护或进一步解释
本技能绝不会做的事
- - 未经人工批准承诺具体退款金额
- 批准超过 refundautoapprove_limit(默认值:0)的退款
- 未经系统确认承诺上门取件/换货日期
- 点名指责员工
- 为逃避退款而否认明显有效的索赔
- 声称客户对事实性质量问题的判断有误