Due Diligence Data Room Skill
Build investor-ready and acquirer-ready data rooms for fundraising (SAFE, priced rounds, Series A/B) and M&A (sell-side or buy-side). This skill guides Sam Ledger through organizing DD documents, identifying gaps, scoring readiness, and producing a clean data room index.
When to Use This Skill
Trigger phrases:
- - "Set up a data room"
- "What do investors need for due diligence?"
- "Prepare for Series A DD"
- "What documents do we need for the M&A process?"
- "Audit our data room"
- "Create a DD checklist"
- "We're getting acquired — what do they need?"
- "Rate our due diligence readiness"
NOT for:
- - Tax filing or accounting — use QBO/compliance workflows
- Smart contract security audits — use INLINECODE0
- Legal advice on specific clauses — refer to counsel
- Ongoing contract management — use INLINECODE1
- Cap table creation from scratch — use INLINECODE2
- Financial model building — use INLINECODE3
Data Room Structure
Standard folder taxonomy used by institutional investors and M&A advisors:
CODEBLOCK0
DD Readiness Scoring
Score each category 0–100 based on document completeness:
| Category | Weight | Scoring Logic |
|---|
| Corporate | 10% | All formation docs present, current, signed |
| Financial |
25% | 3yr statements + monthly actuals + model + bank stmts |
| Cap Table | 20% | Fully diluted table + all agreements + 409A current |
| Commercial | 15% | Top 10 customer contracts + key vendor agreements |
| IP | 15% | Assignments from all founders/employees + IP inventory |
| HR/People | 10% | Employee list + exec agreements + benefits docs |
| Legal | 10% | Litigation disclosure + licenses + insurance |
| Technical | 5% | Architecture + security + SLA history |
Overall Readiness Score:
Score = Σ (Category Score × Category Weight)
Interpretation:
90–100: Investor-ready. Proceed.
75–89: 1–2 week gap closure. Flag gaps to founder.
50–74: 2–4 weeks work. Significant gaps present.
<50: Not ready. Build foundational documents first.
Gap Analysis Output
When auditing an existing data room, produce a gap report in this format:
CODEBLOCK2
Document Checklist by Round Type
SAFE / Pre-Seed Round (Minimal DD)
CODEBLOCK3
Series A (Full Institutional DD)
All folders above, plus:
CODEBLOCK4
M&A Sell-Side
All Series A above, plus:
□ 3 years tax returns (federal + state)
□ Historical financial statements (3–5 years)
□ All material contracts (customer, vendor, partnership)
□ Litigation history (last 5 years, including settled)
□ Environmental compliance (if applicable)
□ Real property leases
□ Insurance policies with coverage limits
□ Employee benefit plan documents (401k, health)
□ Change of control provisions in key contracts
□ Government contracts or regulated agreements
Step-by-Step Workflow
Step 1: Scope the DD Type
Determine:
- - Type: Fundraising (which stage?) or M&A (sell-side or buy-side)?
- Timeline: When is the investor/acquirer expecting access?
- Audience: Who is reviewing? (VC, PE, strategic acquirer, family office?)
Step 2: Intake Audit
Ask the founder/CFO to share:
- - Existing data room link or folder structure
- List of what's been prepared vs. not started
- Any known legal issues (pending litigation, IP disputes)
- Outstanding cap table instruments (unconverted SAFEs, notes)
Step 3: Build Gap Report
Map what exists against the master checklist above.
Score each category.
Flag critical gaps (deal-stoppers) vs. nice-to-haves.
Step 4: Prioritize
Sequence by:
- 1. Deal-stoppers first (IP assignments, 409A, audited financials)
- Investor-specific asks (some VCs have custom checklists — get theirs)
- Everything else in parallel
Step 5: Draft Document Summaries
For key documents, produce a 3-line summary:
- - What it is
- What it says (key terms)
- Any red flags or notes for investor
Step 6: Build the Data Room Index
Produce a master index document:
CODEBLOCK6
Step 7: Final QA Pass
Before opening data room access:
- - [ ] All files named consistently (no "finalFINALv3.pdf")
- [ ] No personal employee info visible to all viewers (use sub-folders with tiered permissions)
- [ ] Sensitive items (bank statements, SSNs) restricted to appropriate viewers
- [ ] Index document is current and matches folder contents
- [ ] Watermarks on sensitive docs if required
Example Interaction
User: "Our Series A investor wants data room access in 2 weeks. We've never set one up. Where do we start?"
Sam's response:
Two weeks is tight but doable if we move fast. Here's the triage plan:
FIRST 48 HOURS — Stop everything else, get these:
1. IP Assignments — every founder and early contractor must sign.
This is the #1 deal-killer. I'll need: names of all founders,
date company was incorporated, names of any early freelancers
who touched the product.
2. Cap Table — send me whatever you have (spreadsheet, Carta export).
I'll audit it and identify any missing countersignatures.
3. Financial Statements — do you have a CPA? If yes, request
management-reviewed or compiled statements for 2023 + 2024.
Full audit takes weeks — we'll flag the gap and provide reviewed.
THIS WEEK — Collect in parallel:
□ All customer contracts (even just the signed MSAs/SOWs)
□ Certificate of Incorporation + any amendments
□ Board minutes (any major funding, equity, or officer decisions)
□ Existing insurance policies (D&O is the critical one)
NEXT WEEK — Build + QA:
□ I'll build the data room index and folder structure
□ Financial model review and clean-up
□ Full gap report for investor
What platform are you using for the data room? (Notion, Google Drive,
Carta Data Room, Caplinked, DocSend?) I'll tailor the structure.
Platform-Specific Notes
| Platform | Best For | Notes |
|---|
| Google Drive | Early-stage, SAFE rounds | Easy setup, permission by folder, familiar |
| Carta Data Room |
Series A+ with Carta cap table | Native integration, investor-friendly |
| Notion | Small rounds, internal prep | Good for checklists, not ideal for investor DD |
| DocSend | Tracking investor engagement | Analytics on who views what, for hours |
| Caplinked / Intralinks | M&A, larger rounds | Watermarking, NDA-gating, enterprise features |
| Box / SharePoint | Acquirer-preferred in M&A | Enterprise IT often requires these |
Red Flags to Surface to Counsel
When auditing documents, flag these immediately — do not attempt to resolve without legal:
CODEBLOCK8
Integration Points
- -
startup-financial-model — generate or audit the financial model included in Section 02 cap-table-manager — build or reconcile the fully-diluted cap table for Section 03contract-review-agent — summarize and flag key customer/vendor contracts for Section 04kpi-alert-system — once funded, monitor key metrics investors will track post-closereport-generator — format the gap report into an investor-ready PDF memo
Reference: Series A Investor DD Checklist (Condensed)
CODEBLOCK9
尽职调查数据室技能
为融资(SAFE、定价轮次、A轮/B轮)和并购(卖方或买方)构建投资者和收购方认可的数据室。该技能指导Sam Ledger整理尽职调查文件、识别差距、评估准备程度并生成清晰的数据室索引。
何时使用此技能
触发短语:
- - 建立数据室
- 投资者在尽职调查中需要什么?
- 为A轮尽职调查做准备
- 并购流程需要哪些文件?
- 审计我们的数据室
- 创建尽职调查清单
- 我们正在被收购——他们需要什么?
- 评估我们的尽职调查准备程度
不适用于:
- - 税务申报或会计——使用QBO/合规工作流
- 智能合约安全审计——使用solidity-audit-precheck
- 特定条款的法律建议——咨询法律顾问
- 持续合同管理——使用contract-review-agent
- 从头创建股权结构表——使用cap-table-manager
- 财务模型构建——使用startup-financial-model
数据室结构
机构投资者和并购顾问使用的标准文件夹分类法:
/DataRoom
├── 01_公司文件
│ ├── 公司注册证书(当前版本及所有修订版)
│ ├── 公司章程/运营协议
│ ├── 董事会决议(过去3年关键行动)
│ ├── 组织架构图
│ └── 子公司及外国资质
│
├── 02_财务
│ ├── 财务报表(3年审计或审阅)
│ ├── 管理账目(最近12个月,按月)
│ ├── 财务模型(基准/悲观/乐观情景)
│ ├── 纳税申报表(3年联邦+州)
│ ├── 应收账款账龄表
│ ├── 应付账款账龄表
│ └── 银行对账单(6-12个月)
│
├── 03_股权结构表
│ ├── 股权结构表(完全稀释,当前)
│ ├── 股票期权计划(ISO/NSO计划文件)
│ ├── 期权授予(个人授予摘要)
│ ├── SAFE协议(所有未结清的)
│ ├── 可转换票据(所有未结清的)
│ ├── 投资者权利协议
│ ├── 优先购买权协议
│ └── 409A估值(最新)
│
├── 04_商业合同
│ ├── 客户合同(按收入排名前10)
│ ├── 供应商/供货商协议(关键依赖项)
│ ├── 合作伙伴协议
│ ├── 分销协议
│ └── 意向书/谅解备忘录(当前)
│
├── 05_知识产权
│ ├── 专利申请及授权
│ ├── 商标注册
│ ├── 版权注册
│ ├── 商业秘密政策
│ ├── 知识产权转让协议(创始人+员工)
│ └── 开源政策+许可证清单
│
├── 06_人力资源
│ ├── 员工名单(姓名、职位、入职日期、薪资)
│ ├── 录用通知书(关键招聘/高管)
│ ├── 雇佣协议(高管保密协议、竞业禁止)
│ ├── 承包商/1099名单+协议
│ ├── 福利计划摘要文件
│ ├── PEO/薪资提供商协议
│ └── 组织架构图(人员版)
│
├── 07_法律合规
│ ├── 诉讼历史(待决、已和解、已威胁)
│ ├── 监管许可证/许可
│ ├── 隐私政策+服务条款
│ ├── GDPR/CCPA合规文件
│ ├── 数据处理协议(关键供应商)
│ └── 保险单(D&O、E&O、网络、一般责任险)
│
├── 08_技术
│ ├── 架构图(系统概览)
│ ├── 技术栈摘要
│ ├── 安全审计报告(渗透测试、SOC 2)
│ ├── 正常运行时间/SLA历史
│ ├── 灾难恢复计划
│ └── 数据处理/隐私架构
│
└── 09_业务概览
├── 推介材料(当前投资者版本)
├── 执行摘要/一页纸
├── 产品路线图
├── 客户推荐(顶级客户)
└── 市场研究/竞争分析
尽职调查准备程度评分
根据文件完整性对每个类别进行0-100评分:
| 类别 | 权重 | 评分逻辑 |
|---|
| 公司文件 | 10% | 所有成立文件齐全、最新、已签署 |
| 财务 |
25% | 3年报表+月度实际数据+模型+银行对账单 |
| 股权结构表 | 20% | 完全稀释表+所有协议+当前409A |
| 商业 | 15% | 前10大客户合同+关键供应商协议 |
| 知识产权 | 15% | 所有创始人/员工转让+知识产权清单 |
| 人力资源 | 10% | 员工名单+高管协议+福利文件 |
| 法律 | 10% | 诉讼披露+许可证+保险 |
| 技术 | 5% | 架构+安全+SLA历史 |
总体准备程度评分:
评分 = Σ(类别评分 × 类别权重)
解读:
90-100:投资者就绪。继续推进。
75-89:1-2周差距弥补。向创始人标记差距。
50-74:2-4周工作。存在显著差距。
<50:未就绪。先构建基础文件。
差距分析输出
审计现有数据室时,按以下格式生成差距报告:
尽职调查准备程度报告
公司:[名称]
日期:[日期]
评估人:Sam Ledger / PrecisionLedger
总体评分:72/100 — 需要2-3周工作
类别细分:
┌─────────────────────┬───────┬────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ 类别 │ 评分 │ 缺失/风险 │
├─────────────────────┼───────┼────────────────────────────────────────────────┤
│ 公司文件 │ 90% │ 缺失:外国资质(特拉华州公司) │
│ 财务 │ 65% │ 缺失:审计报表,409A已过期 │
│ 股权结构表 │ 80% │ 缺失:2份SAFE协议未副签 │
│ 商业 │ 70% │ 缺失:前10大客户中3家合同 │
│ 知识产权 │ 55% │ 缺失:1位联合创始人的知识产权转让 │
│ 人力资源 │ 85% │ 次要:2名工程人员的录用通知书过时 │
│ 法律 │ 90% │ 正常 │
│ 技术 │ 60% │ 缺失:渗透测试报告,无SLA文件 │
└─────────────────────┴───────┴────────────────────────────────────────────────┘
关键差距(将阻碍交易):
- 1. [姓名]联合创始人的知识产权转让——在接触前签署
- 409A估值——已过期18个月以上,投资者会指出
- 审计财务报表——A轮投资者通常要求至少1年审计
高优先级(2周修复):
- 4. SAFE副签——取回原件,追查签署人
- 缺失的客户合同——存档保密协议或主服务协议
中优先级(可并行修复):
- 6. 特拉华州外国资质证书
- 渗透测试报告——如未完成则安排
- 更新近期工程人员的录用通知书
建议下一步:
第1周:解决关键差距(知识产权转让、409A、审计财务报表)
第2周:高优先级事项
第3周:全面审查+数据室质量检查
按轮次类型的文件清单
SAFE/种子前轮(最低限度尽职调查)
□ 公司注册证书
□ 股权结构表(当前,包含所有SAFE)
□ 财务模型或推介材料财务数据
□ 待签署的SAFE模板
□ 创始人知识产权转让
□ 银行对账单(3个月)
A轮(全面机构尽职调查)
以上所有文件夹,外加:
□ 审计财务报表(至少1年,2年更佳)
□ 月度管理账目(最近12个月)
□ 409A估值(< 12个月)
□ 所有重大决策的董事会会议记录
□ 完全稀释股权结构表(含期权池)
□ 所有未结清的可转换工具(SAFE、票据)
□ 客户合同(按收入排名前10)
□ 知识产权转让(所有创始人、关键员工、承包商)
□ 雇佣协议(所有高管)
并购卖方
以上A轮所有内容,外加:
□ 3年纳税申报表(联邦+州)
□