When to Use
User needs help managing incoming streams across email, chat, social, and project tools. Agent applies triage methodology, response workflows, and cognitive load strategies to any inbox type.
Quick Reference
| Topic | File |
|---|
| Triage & prioritization | INLINECODE0 |
| Response workflows |
responses.md |
| Multi-channel orchestration |
channels.md |
| Cognitive load reduction |
cognitive.md |
Scope
This skill provides methodology and decision frameworks. It does NOT integrate with specific services.
This skill ONLY:
- - Applies triage frameworks to items the user presents
- Suggests response strategies and templates
- Provides cognitive load reduction techniques
- Helps prioritize across multiple inbox sources
This skill NEVER:
- - Directly accesses email, calendar, or chat APIs
- Reads messages without user presenting them
- Sends responses automatically
- Stores user's messages or inbox data
For technical integrations (IMAP, SMTP, API), use platform-specific skills.
What "Inbox" Means
Not just email. Any incoming stream requiring attention:
- - Email (multiple accounts)
- Chat platforms (Slack, Discord, Teams, WhatsApp)
- Social DMs (Twitter, LinkedIn, Instagram)
- Project tools (GitHub, Jira, Asana, Notion)
- Calendar invites
- Voice messages and audio notes
- Saved articles, "read later" queues
Core Rules
1. Triage Before Presenting
Never show raw chronological dump. Classify first:
| Bucket | Action |
|---|
| Requires decision | Surface immediately |
| Requires awareness |
Daily digest |
| Can be delegated | Route with context |
| Noise | Auto-archive suggestion |
2. Minimize Visible Numbers
Show: "3 items need your attention"
Not: "47 unread messages"
The count itself triggers anxiety. Surface actionable items only.
3. Batch Similar Items
Group by type, project, or sender. "Here are 7 intro requests" beats 7 separate interruptions. Reduces context switching.
4. Surface Aging Items Proactively
When user presents their inbox, detect items sliding toward urgency:
- - 3+ days old → flag as pending
- 7+ days old → flag as concerning
- Item with deadline approaching → calculate remaining buffer
5. Match Energy to Capacity
Before processing, ask available time/energy:
| State | Offer |
|---|
| "5 min, low energy" | 2-3 quick approvals |
| "30 min, focused" |
Deep response queue |
| "Need a win" | Easiest clearable items |
6. Detect Avoidance Patterns
When same item mentioned as snoozed/skipped 3+ times:
- 1. Acknowledge: "You've been avoiding this one"
- Break down: "Can we handle just one part?"
- Lower bar: "Just send a holding response?"
7. Response Type Selection
| Type | When | Automation |
|---|
| Pre-approved template | FAQ, link requests | Suggest ready-to-send |
| Draft for approval |
Routine, personalized | One-click approve/edit |
| Holding response | Can't respond fully | "Received, will review by X" |
| Full compose | Complex/sensitive | User writes |
Common Traps
- - Showing all unread → overwhelms user, causes avoidance. Triage first.
- Ignoring channel source → email vs Slack vs DM have different urgency norms.
- Treating snooze as archive → snoozed items MUST return. Track and resurface.
- Missing multi-channel attempts → same person emailing + texting + calling = high urgency signal.
- Forgetting "read later" → saved items decay into guilt. Resurface one per day.
技能名称:收件箱
适用场景
用户需要管理来自电子邮件、聊天、社交和项目工具的多渠道信息流。本技能可为任何类型的收件箱提供分类处理方法、响应工作流程及认知负荷管理策略。
快速参考
| 主题 | 文件 |
|---|
| 分类与优先级排序 | triage.md |
| 响应工作流程 |
responses.md |
| 多渠道协调 | channels.md |
| 认知负荷降低 | cognitive.md |
适用范围
本技能提供方法论和决策框架,不集成特定服务。
本技能仅:
- - 对用户呈现的内容应用分类框架
- 提供响应策略和模板建议
- 提供认知负荷降低技巧
- 帮助跨多个收件箱来源进行优先级排序
本技能绝不:
- - 直接访问电子邮件、日历或聊天API
- 在用户未呈现的情况下读取消息
- 自动发送回复
- 存储用户消息或收件箱数据
如需技术集成(IMAP、SMTP、API),请使用特定平台技能。
收件箱定义
不仅限于电子邮件。任何需要关注的信息流:
- - 电子邮件(多账户)
- 聊天平台(Slack、Discord、Teams、WhatsApp)
- 社交私信(Twitter、LinkedIn、Instagram)
- 项目工具(GitHub、Jira、Asana、Notion)
- 日历邀请
- 语音消息和音频笔记
- 已保存文章、稍后阅读队列
核心规则
1. 先分类再呈现
绝不展示原始时间顺序列表。先进行分类:
每日摘要 |
| 可委托他人 | 附上背景信息转发 |
| 干扰信息 | 建议自动归档 |
2. 最小化可见数字
应展示: 3项需要您关注
不应展示: 47封未读消息
数字本身会引发焦虑。仅呈现可操作项。
3. 批量处理同类项
按类型、项目或发件人分组。这里有7个介绍请求优于7次单独打扰。减少上下文切换。
4. 主动呈现积压项
当用户展示收件箱时,检测即将变得紧急的项目:
- - 超过3天 → 标记为待处理
- 超过7天 → 标记为需关注
- 临近截止日期的项目 → 计算剩余缓冲时间
5. 匹配精力与能力
处理前,询问可用时间/精力:
| 状态 | 提供方案 |
|---|
| 5分钟,精力不足 | 2-3个快速审批 |
| 30分钟,专注 |
深度回复队列 |
| 需要成就感 | 最容易清除的项目 |
6. 检测回避模式
当同一项目被标记为稍后处理或跳过3次以上时:
- 1. 确认:您一直在回避这个
- 分解:我们能否只处理其中一部分?
- 降低标准:只需发送一个临时回复?
7. 响应类型选择
| 类型 | 适用场景 | 自动化程度 |
|---|
| 预批准模板 | 常见问题、链接请求 | 建议直接发送 |
| 待审批草稿 |
常规、个性化回复 | 一键批准/编辑 |
| 临时回复 | 无法完整回复 | 已收到,将在X前回复 |
| 完整撰写 | 复杂/敏感内容 | 用户自行撰写 |
常见陷阱
- - 展示所有未读项 → 使用户不堪重负,导致回避。先分类。
- 忽略渠道来源 → 电子邮件、Slack、私信有不同的紧急程度规范。
- 将稍后处理视为归档 → 稍后处理的项目必须返回。追踪并重新呈现。
- 遗漏多渠道尝试 → 同一人同时发邮件、发短信、打电话 = 高紧急信号。
- 忘记稍后阅读 → 已保存项目会随时间变成负罪感。每天重新呈现一个。