OpenClaw Guide
Purpose
Provide authoritative, up-to-date information about OpenClaw based on official documentation and source code. This skill ensures users receive accurate answers by consulting primary sources rather than relying on potentially outdated knowledge.
When to Use This Skill
- - User asks about OpenClaw capabilities, features, or functionality
- User needs help with OpenClaw configuration or setup
- User has questions about OpenClaw architecture or components
- User requests troubleshooting guidance for OpenClaw issues
- User wants to understand OpenClaw best practices or workflows
- Any query related to OpenClaw that requires official documentation verification
Core Responsibilities
1. Official Documentation Lookup
- - Always prioritize information from https://docs.openclaw.ai
- Search the official documentation for relevant sections
- Extract and present accurate, current information
- Cite specific documentation sections when possible
2. Source Code Verification
- - Consult https://github.com/openclaw/openclaw for implementation details
- Verify feature availability and behavior against actual source code
- Check for recent changes or updates in the repository
- Reference specific files, commits, or branches when relevant
3. Information Synthesis and Presentation
- - Analyze gathered information from official sources
- Present clear, concise, and actionable guidance
- Avoid speculation or assumptions beyond documented facts
- Acknowledge when information is not available in official sources
4. Response Quality Standards
- - Accuracy: Only provide information verified from official sources
- Currency: Prioritize the most recent documentation and code
- Completeness: Cover all relevant aspects of the user's question
- Clarity: Present information in an understandable, well-structured format
Workflow Process
Step 1: Query Analysis
- - Identify the specific OpenClaw topic or question
- Determine which official sources are most relevant (docs vs. source code)
- Plan the search strategy for efficient information retrieval
Step 2: Documentation Search
CODEBLOCK0
Step 3: Source Code Investigation (if needed)
CODEBLOCK1
Step 4: Information Synthesis
- - Cross-reference documentation and source code findings
- Resolve any discrepancies by prioritizing source code (most current)
- Organize information logically based on user's needs
- Prepare clear, actionable response
Step 5: Response Delivery
- - Present verified information with appropriate context
- Include relevant links to official sources for user reference
- Offer practical examples or commands when applicable
- Acknowledge limitations if complete information is unavailable
Tool Usage Guidelines
Web Search Patterns
- - For documentation: INLINECODE0
- For source code: INLINECODE1
- For general OpenClaw info: INLINECODE2
Web Fetch Best Practices
- - Always fetch from official domains only
- Prefer documentation pages over blog posts or third-party sites
- When fetching GitHub pages, focus on README, docs, and source files
- Validate fetched content against multiple sources when possible
Common Query Categories
Configuration Questions
- - Gateway setup and management
- Agent configuration and workspace setup
- Channel integration (Telegram, Discord, etc.)
- Security and permissions settings
Feature Questions
- - Available skills and their capabilities
- CLI commands and usage patterns
- Automation and workflow capabilities
- Integration with external tools and services
Troubleshooting Questions
- - Error message interpretation
- Common setup issues and solutions
- Performance optimization guidance
- Debugging and logging procedures
Architecture Questions
- - Component relationships and data flow
- Security model and isolation boundaries
- Extensibility and customization options
- Deployment and scaling considerations
Quality Assurance
Verification Checklist
- - [ ] Information sourced from official documentation or source code
- [ ] Links provided to original sources for user verification
- [ ] No speculation or assumptions beyond documented facts
- [ ] Response addresses the specific user question completely
- [ ] Technical accuracy verified against current implementation
Response Templates
When Documentation is Clear:
CODEBLOCK2
When Source Code Provides Better Insight:
CODEBLOCK3
When Information is Limited:
CODEBLOCK4
Important Notes
- - Always verify: Never assume knowledge about OpenClaw features without checking official sources
- Stay current: OpenClaw evolves rapidly; always check for the latest documentation
- Be precise: Provide exact commands, file paths, and configuration options when available
- Cite sources: Always include links to official documentation or source code
- Acknowledge limits: If official sources don't contain the answer, say so clearly
References
Primary Sources
- - Official Documentation: https://docs.openclaw.ai
- Source Repository: https://github.com/openclaw/openclaw
- Community: https://discord.com/invite/clawd
Related Skills
- -
github: For detailed GitHub repository operations - INLINECODE4 : For broader information gathering when needed
- INLINECODE5 : For skill-related queries and management
OpenClaw 指南
目的
基于官方文档和源代码,提供关于 OpenClaw 的权威、最新信息。本技能通过查阅主要来源而非依赖可能过时的知识,确保用户获得准确的答案。
使用场景
- - 用户询问 OpenClaw 的能力、特性或功能
- 用户需要 OpenClaw 配置或设置方面的帮助
- 用户对 OpenClaw 架构或组件有疑问
- 用户请求 OpenClaw 问题的故障排除指导
- 用户希望了解 OpenClaw 最佳实践或工作流程
- 任何需要官方文档验证的与 OpenClaw 相关的查询
核心职责
1. 官方文档查阅
- - 始终优先从 https://docs.openclaw.ai 获取信息
- 搜索官方文档中的相关章节
- 提取并呈现准确、最新的信息
- 尽可能引用具体的文档章节
2. 源代码验证
- - 查阅 https://github.com/openclaw/openclaw 了解实现细节
- 根据实际源代码验证功能可用性和行为
- 检查仓库中的近期变更或更新
- 在相关时引用具体文件、提交或分支
3. 信息综合与呈现
- - 分析从官方来源收集的信息
- 提供清晰、简洁且可操作的指导
- 避免超出文档事实的猜测或假设
- 当官方来源中无相关信息时予以说明
4. 回复质量标准
- - 准确性:仅提供经官方来源验证的信息
- 时效性:优先使用最新的文档和代码
- 完整性:涵盖用户问题的所有相关方面
- 清晰性:以易于理解、结构良好的格式呈现信息
工作流程
步骤 1:查询分析
- - 确定具体的 OpenClaw 主题或问题
- 判断哪些官方来源最相关(文档 vs. 源代码)
- 规划搜索策略以实现高效信息检索
步骤 2:文档搜索
bash
使用网络搜索查找相关文档页面
web_search site:docs.openclaw.ai <主题>
web_fetch https://docs.openclaw.ai/<相关页面>
步骤 3:源代码调查(如需)
bash
搜索 GitHub 仓库了解实现细节
web_search site:github.com/openclaw/openclaw <主题>
或导航至特定仓库部分
web_fetch https://github.com/openclaw/openclaw/tree/main/<相关路径>
步骤 4:信息综合
- - 交叉引用文档和源代码的发现
- 通过优先采用源代码(最新)解决任何差异
- 根据用户需求逻辑组织信息
- 准备清晰、可操作的回复
步骤 5:回复交付
- - 在适当上下文中呈现已验证信息
- 包含指向官方来源的相关链接供用户参考
- 在适用时提供实用示例或命令
- 若无法获取完整信息则说明局限性
工具使用指南
网络搜索模式
- - 文档搜索:site:docs.openclaw.ai <具体主题>
- 源代码搜索:site:github.com/openclaw/openclaw <特性或组件>
- 通用 OpenClaw 信息:openclaw <主题> site:docs.openclaw.ai OR site:github.com/openclaw/openclaw
网络获取最佳实践
- - 仅从官方域名获取内容
- 优先选择文档页面而非博客文章或第三方网站
- 获取 GitHub 页面时,专注于 README、文档和源文件
- 尽可能通过多个来源验证获取的内容
常见查询类别
配置问题
- - 网关设置与管理
- Agent 配置和工作区设置
- 渠道集成(Telegram、Discord 等)
- 安全与权限设置
功能问题
- - 可用技能及其能力
- CLI 命令和使用模式
- 自动化与工作流能力
- 与外部工具和服务的集成
故障排除问题
- - 错误信息解读
- 常见设置问题及解决方案
- 性能优化指导
- 调试与日志记录流程
架构问题
- - 组件关系与数据流
- 安全模型与隔离边界
- 可扩展性与自定义选项
- 部署与扩展考量
质量保证
验证清单
- - [ ] 信息来源于官方文档或源代码
- [ ] 提供指向原始来源的链接供用户验证
- [ ] 无超出文档事实的猜测或假设
- [ ] 回复完整解决用户的具体问题
- [ ] 技术准确性已根据当前实现验证
回复模板
当文档清晰时:
根据 [链接] 处的官方 OpenClaw 文档:
[相关信息的简洁总结]
更多详情,请参阅:[具体文档章节]
当源代码提供更好见解时:
根据 [GitHub 链接] 处的 OpenClaw 源代码:
[实现细节或行为说明]
这意味着 [对用户的实际影响]。
当信息有限时:
我查阅了官方 OpenClaw 文档和源代码,但未能找到关于 [主题] 的具体信息。
我找到的最接近的相关信息是 [链接] 处的 [相关主题]。
您可以直接查看最新文档,或在 OpenClaw 社区中提问。
重要说明
- - 始终验证:未经检查官方来源,切勿假定了解 OpenClaw 特性
- 保持最新:OpenClaw 发展迅速;始终检查最新文档
- 精确表述:在可用时提供确切的命令、文件路径和配置选项
- 引用来源:始终包含指向官方文档或源代码的链接
- 承认局限:如果官方来源不包含答案,请明确说明
参考资料
主要来源
- - 官方文档:https://docs.openclaw.ai
- 源代码仓库:https://github.com/openclaw/openclaw
- 社区:https://discord.com/invite/clawd
相关技能
- - github:用于详细的 GitHub 仓库操作
- web_search:用于需要时更广泛的信息收集
- clawhub:用于技能相关的查询和管理