Biotech Patent Landscape Analyzer

Analyze biotech and pharmaceutical patent landscapes to identify opportunities, assess competition, and guide R&D strategy.

When to Use

• - Use this skill when the task needs Use when analyzing biotech patent landscapes, identifying white spaces in pharmaceutical IP, tracking competitor patents, or assessing freedom to operate for drug development. Provides comprehensive patent analysis and strategic insights for life sciences innovation.
• Use this skill for evidence insight tasks that require explicit assumptions, bounded scope, and a reproducible output format.
• Use this skill when you need a documented fallback path for missing inputs, execution errors, or partial evidence.

Key Features

• - Scope-focused workflow aligned to: Use when analyzing biotech patent landscapes, identifying white spaces in pharmaceutical IP, tracking competitor patents, or assessing freedom to operate for drug development. Provides comprehensive patent analysis and strategic insights for life sciences innovation.
• Packaged executable path(s): scripts/main.py.
• Reference material available in references/ for task-specific guidance.
• Structured execution path designed to keep outputs consistent and reviewable.

Dependencies

• - Python: 3.10+. Repository baseline for current packaged skills.
• INLINECODE4: not explicitly version-pinned in this skill package. Add pinned versions if this skill needs stricter environment control.

Example Usage

CODEBLOCK0

Example run plan:

1. 1. Confirm the user input, output path, and any required config values.
2. Edit the in-file CONFIG block or documented parameters if the script uses fixed settings.
3. Run python scripts/main.py with the validated inputs.
4. Review the generated output and return the final artifact with any assumptions called out.

Implementation Details

See ## Workflow above for related details.

• - Execution model: validate the request, choose the packaged workflow, and produce a bounded deliverable.
• Input controls: confirm the source files, scope limits, output format, and acceptance criteria before running any script.
• Primary implementation surface: scripts/main.py.
• Reference guidance: references/ contains supporting rules, prompts, or checklists.
• Parameters to clarify first: input path, output path, scope filters, thresholds, and any domain-specific constraints.
• Output discipline: keep results reproducible, identify assumptions explicitly, and avoid undocumented side effects.

Quick Check

Use this command to verify that the packaged script entry point can be parsed before deeper execution.

CODEBLOCK1

Audit-Ready Commands

Use these concrete commands for validation. They are intentionally self-contained and avoid placeholder paths.

CODEBLOCK2

Workflow

1. 1. Confirm the user objective, required inputs, and non-negotiable constraints before doing detailed work.
2. Validate that the request matches the documented scope and stop early if the task would require unsupported assumptions.
3. Use the packaged script path or the documented reasoning path with only the inputs that are actually available.
4. Return a structured result that separates assumptions, deliverables, risks, and unresolved items.
5. If execution fails or inputs are incomplete, switch to the fallback path and state exactly what blocked full completion.

Quick Start

CODEBLOCK3

Core Capabilities

1. Patent Search & Analysis

CODEBLOCK4

Search Strategies:

• - Keyword-based: Technical terms + synonyms
• Classification-based: IPC/CPC codes
• Citation-based: Forward/backward citations
• Assignee-based: Company portfolios

2. White Space Analysis

CODEBLOCK5

White Space Opportunities:

• - Underserved disease indications
• Novel combination therapies
• Alternative delivery mechanisms
• Geographical gaps (emerging markets)

3. Competitor Intelligence

CODEBLOCK6

Competitor Metrics:

4. Freedom to Operate (FTO) Assessment

CODEBLOCK7

FTO Analysis Steps:

1. 1. Identify relevant patent claims
2. Map claims to product features
3. Assess validity of blocking patents
4. Design around options
5. Licensing recommendations

CLI Usage

CODEBLOCK8

Data Sources

• - USPTO (United States)
• EPO (Europe)
• WIPO (Global)
• JPO (Japan)
• CNIPA (China)

References

• - references/ipc-classifications.md - IPC/CPC codes for biotech
• INLINECODE12 - Advanced search techniques
• INLINECODE13 - Sample reports

Output Requirements

Every final response should make these items explicit when they are relevant:

• - Objective or requested deliverable
• Inputs used and assumptions introduced
• Workflow or decision path
• Core result, recommendation, or artifact
• Constraints, risks, caveats, or validation needs
• Unresolved items and next-step checks

Error Handling

• - If required inputs are missing, state exactly which fields are missing and request only the minimum additional information.
• If the task goes outside the documented scope, stop instead of guessing or silently widening the assignment.
• If scripts/main.py fails, report the failure point, summarize what still can be completed safely, and provide a manual fallback.
• Do not fabricate files, citations, data, search results, or execution outcomes.

Input Validation

This skill accepts requests that match the documented purpose of patent-landscape and include enough context to complete the workflow safely.

Do not continue the workflow when the request is out of scope, missing a critical input, or would require unsupported assumptions. Instead respond:

INLINECODE16 only handles its documented workflow. Please provide the missing required inputs or switch to a more suitable skill.

References

• - references/audit-reference.md - Supported scope, audit commands, and fallback boundaries

Response Template

Use the following fixed structure for non-trivial requests:

1. 1. Objective
2. Inputs Received
3. Assumptions
4. Workflow
5. Deliverable
6. Risks and Limits
7. Next Checks

If the request is simple, you may compress the structure, but still keep assumptions and limits explicit when they affect correctness.