Sector Analyst
Overview
This skill enables comprehensive analysis of sector and industry performance charts to identify market cycle positioning and predict likely rotation scenarios. The analysis combines observed performance data with established sector rotation principles to provide objective market assessment and probabilistic scenario forecasting.
When to Use This Skill
Use this skill when:
- - User provides sector performance charts (typically 1-week and 1-month timeframes)
- User provides industry performance charts showing relative performance data
- User requests analysis of current market cycle positioning
- User asks for sector rotation assessment or predictions
- User needs probability-weighted scenarios for market positioning
Example user requests:
- - "Analyze these sector performance charts and tell me where we are in the market cycle"
- "Based on these performance charts, what sectors should outperform next?"
- "What's the probability of a defensive rotation based on this data?"
- "Review these sector and industry charts and provide scenario analysis"
Analysis Workflow
Follow this structured workflow when analyzing sector/industry performance charts:
Step 1: Data Collection and Observation
First, carefully examine all provided chart images to extract:
- - Sector-level performance: Identify which sectors (Technology, Financials, Consumer Discretionary, etc.) are outperforming/underperforming
- Industry-level performance: Note specific industries showing strength or weakness
- Timeframe comparison: Compare 1-week vs 1-month performance to identify trend consistency or divergence
- Magnitude of moves: Assess the size of relative performance differences
- Breadth of movement: Determine if performance is concentrated or broad-based
Think in English while analyzing the charts. Document specific numerical performance figures for key sectors and industries.
Step 2: Market Cycle Assessment
Load the sector rotation knowledge base to inform analysis:
- - Read
references/sector_rotation.md to access market cycle and sector rotation frameworks - Compare observed performance patterns against expected patterns for each cycle phase:
- Early Cycle Recovery
- Mid Cycle Expansion
- Late Cycle
- Recession
Identify which cycle phase best matches current observations by:
- - Mapping outperforming sectors to typical cycle leaders
- Mapping underperforming sectors to typical cycle laggards
- Assessing consistency across multiple sectors
- Evaluating alignment with defensive vs cyclical sector performance
Step 3: Current Situation Analysis
Synthesize observations into an objective assessment:
- - State which market cycle phase current performance most closely resembles
- Highlight supporting evidence (which sectors/industries confirm this view)
- Note any contradictory signals or unusual patterns
- Assess confidence level based on consistency of signals
Use data-driven language and specific references to performance figures.
Step 4: Scenario Development
Based on sector rotation principles and current positioning, develop 2-4 potential scenarios for the next phase:
For each scenario:
- - Describe the market cycle transition
- Identify which sectors would likely outperform
- Identify which sectors would likely underperform
- Specify the catalysts or conditions that would confirm this scenario
- Assign a probability (see Probability Assessment Framework in sector_rotation.md)
Scenarios should range from most likely (highest probability) to alternative/contrarian scenarios.
Step 5: Output Generation
Create a structured Markdown document with the following sections:
Required Sections:
- 1. Executive Summary: 2-3 sentence overview of key findings
- Current Situation: Detailed analysis of current performance patterns and market cycle positioning
- Supporting Evidence: Specific sector and industry performance data supporting the cycle assessment
- Scenario Analysis: 2-4 scenarios with descriptions and probability assignments
- Recommended Positioning: Strategic and tactical positioning recommendations based on scenario probabilities
- Key Risks: Notable risks or contradictory signals to monitor
Output Format
Save analysis results as a Markdown file with naming convention: INLINECODE1
Use this structure:
CODEBLOCK0
Key Analysis Principles
When conducting analysis:
- 1. Objectivity First: Let the data guide conclusions, not preconceptions
- Probabilistic Thinking: Express uncertainty through probability ranges
- Multiple Timeframes: Compare 1-week and 1-month data for trend confirmation
- Relative Performance: Focus on relative strength, not absolute returns
- Breadth Matters: Broad-based moves are more significant than isolated movements
- No Absolutes: Markets rarely follow textbook patterns exactly
- Historical Context: Reference typical rotation patterns but acknowledge uniqueness
Probability Guidelines
Apply these probability ranges based on evidence strength:
- - 70-85%: Strong evidence with multiple confirming signals across sectors and timeframes
- 50-70%: Moderate evidence with some confirming signals but mixed indicators
- 30-50%: Weak evidence with limited or conflicting signals
- 15-30%: Speculative scenario contrary to current indicators but possible
Total probabilities across all scenarios should sum to approximately 100%.
Resources
references/
- -
sector_rotation.md - Comprehensive knowledge base covering market cycle phases, typical sector performance patterns, and probability assessment frameworks
assets/
Sample charts demonstrating the expected input format:
- -
sector_performance.jpeg - Example sector-level performance chart (1-week and 1-month) - INLINECODE4 - Example industry performance chart (outperformers)
- INLINECODE5 - Example industry performance chart (underperformers)
These samples illustrate the type of visual data this skill analyzes. User-provided charts may vary in format but should contain similar relative performance information.
Important Notes
- - All analysis thinking should be conducted in English
- Output Markdown files must be in English
- Reference the sector rotation knowledge base for each analysis
- Maintain objectivity and avoid confirmation bias
- Update probability assessments if new data becomes available
- Charts typically show performance over 1-week and 1-month periods
行业分析师
概述
该技能能够全面分析行业与板块表现图表,识别市场周期定位,并预测可能的轮动情景。分析结合观察到的表现数据与成熟的板块轮动原则,提供客观的市场评估与概率情景预测。
使用场景
在以下情况下使用该技能:
- - 用户提供板块表现图表(通常为1周和1个月时间框架)
- 用户提供行业表现图表,显示相对表现数据
- 用户请求分析当前市场周期定位
- 用户询问板块轮动评估或预测
- 用户需要基于概率权重的市场定位情景
用户请求示例:
- - 分析这些板块表现图表,告诉我我们处于市场周期的哪个阶段
- 根据这些表现图表,接下来哪些板块应该表现更好?
- 基于这些数据,防御性轮动的概率是多少?
- 查看这些板块和行业图表,提供情景分析
分析流程
分析板块/行业表现图表时,遵循以下结构化流程:
第一步:数据收集与观察
首先,仔细检查所有提供的图表图像,提取:
- - 板块层面表现:识别哪些板块(科技、金融、非必需消费等)表现优于/劣于大盘
- 行业层面表现:注意表现强势或弱势的具体行业
- 时间框架对比:比较1周与1个月的表现,识别趋势一致性或背离
- 波动幅度:评估相对表现差异的大小
- 波动广度:判断表现是集中还是广泛分布
分析图表时用英语思考。记录关键板块和行业的具体数值表现数据。
第二步:市场周期评估
加载板块轮动知识库以辅助分析:
- - 阅读references/sector_rotation.md,获取市场周期与板块轮动框架
- 将观察到的表现模式与每个周期阶段的预期模式进行对比:
- 早期周期复苏
- 中期周期扩张
- 晚期周期
- 衰退期
通过以下方式识别最匹配当前观察的周期阶段:
- - 将表现优异的板块映射到典型的周期领先板块
- 将表现落后的板块映射到典型的周期滞后板块
- 评估多个板块之间的一致性
- 评估防御性与周期性板块表现的匹配度
第三步:当前形势分析
将观察结果综合为客观评估:
- - 说明当前表现最接近哪个市场周期阶段
- 突出支持证据(哪些板块/行业确认了这一观点)
- 注意任何矛盾信号或异常模式
- 基于信号一致性评估置信水平
使用数据驱动语言,并具体引用表现数据。
第四步:情景开发
基于板块轮动原则和当前定位,为下一阶段开发2-4个潜在情景:
每个情景包括:
- - 描述市场周期过渡
- 识别可能表现优异的板块
- 识别可能表现落后的板块
- 指定确认该情景的催化剂或条件
- 分配概率(参见sector_rotation.md中的概率评估框架)
情景范围应从最可能(最高概率)到替代/反向情景。
第五步:输出生成
创建结构化的Markdown文档,包含以下部分:
必需部分:
- 1. 执行摘要:2-3句关键发现概述
- 当前形势:当前表现模式和市场周期定位的详细分析
- 支持证据:支持周期评估的具体板块和行业表现数据
- 情景分析:2-4个情景,包含描述和概率分配
- 推荐定位:基于情景概率的战略和战术定位建议
- 关键风险:需要关注的显著风险或矛盾信号
输出格式
将分析结果保存为Markdown文件,命名规范:sectoranalysisYYYY-MM-DD.md
使用以下结构:
markdown
板块表现分析 - [日期]
执行摘要
[2-3句关键发现总结]
当前形势
市场周期评估
[哪个周期阶段及原因]
观察到的表现模式
1周表现
[近期表现分析]
1个月表现
[中期趋势分析]
板块层面分析
[按板块详细分解]
行业层面分析
[值得注意的行业特定观察]
支持证据
确认信号
矛盾信号
情景分析
情景1:[名称](概率:XX%)
描述:[发生什么]
表现优异者:[板块/行业]
表现落后者:[板块/行业]
催化剂:[什么会确认该情景]
情景2:[名称](概率:XX%)
[重复结构]
[根据需要添加更多情景]
推荐定位
战略定位(中期)
[板块配置建议]
战术定位(短期)
[具体调整或机会]
关键风险与监控点
[需要关注的可能使分析失效的因素]
分析日期:[日期]
数据周期:[分析图表的时间框架]
关键分析原则
进行分析时:
- 1. 客观优先:让数据引导结论,而非先入为主
- 概率思维:通过概率范围表达不确定性
- 多时间框架:比较1周和1个月数据以确认趋势
- 相对表现:关注相对强度,而非绝对回报
- 广度重要:广泛波动比孤立波动更具意义
- 无绝对:市场很少完全遵循教科书模式
- 历史背景:参考典型轮动模式,但承认独特性
概率指南
根据证据强度应用以下概率范围:
- - 70-85%:强证据,跨板块和时间框架有多个确认信号
- 50-70%:中等证据,有一些确认信号但指标混合
- 30-50%:弱证据,信号有限或冲突
- 15-30%:投机性情景,与当前指标相反但可能发生
所有情景的总概率应约为100%。
资源
references/
- - sector_rotation.md - 涵盖市场周期阶段、典型板块表现模式和概率评估框架的全面知识库
assets/
展示预期输入格式的示例图表:
- - sectorperformance.jpeg - 示例板块层面表现图表(1周和1个月)
- industoryperformance1.jpeg - 示例行业表现图表(表现优异者)
- industoryperformance_2.jpeg - 示例行业表现图表(表现落后者)
这些示例说明了该技能分析的视觉数据类型。用户提供的图表格式可能不同,但应包含类似的相对表现信息。
重要说明
- - 所有分析思考应以英语进行
- 输出的Markdown文件必须为英文
- 每次分析均需参考板块轮动知识库
- 保持客观,避免确认偏差
- 如有新数据可用,更新概率评估
- 图表通常显示1周和1个月期间的表现