Taobao Competitor Analyzer
Compare a Taobao product with the same or closest-matching listings on 京东、拼多多、唯品会 using the browser tool only. Work from a product name, collect visible listing information, and return a compact comparison with price evidence, match quality, buying recommendation, and risk notes.
What makes this skill useful:
- - It compares comparable items instead of chasing misleading low prices.
- It explains whether a lower price depends on coupons, membership, subsidy, or group-buy.
- It ends with a clear buy / wait / avoid recommendation instead of just a table.
When To Use
Use this skill when the user is effectively asking:
- - 这件淘宝商品别的平台多少钱
- 有没有同款或更划算的平台
- 京东 / 拼多多 / 唯品会 哪个更值得买
- 这几个平台价格差这么多正常吗
- 帮我做一个同款比价和购买建议
The skill should optimize for purchase decisions, not raw data collection.
Commerce Matrix
This skill is the cross-platform comparison node in the shopping matrix.
Prefer nearby skills when the task is narrower:
- -
taobao-shopping for Taobao-only listing and seller evaluation - INLINECODE1 for trust-first self-operated buying
- INLINECODE2 for low-price and subsidy-first buying
- INLINECODE3 for flagship-store and authenticity-first buying
- INLINECODE4 for branded discount and flash-sale buying
- INLINECODE5 when the user first needs to choose between Taobao, Tmall, and 1688
Workflow
- 1. Normalize the input product name.
- If the input is only a Taobao-style long title, compress it into the smallest searchable core:
- brand
- model / series
- size / spec / count
- key variant
- 3. Search the exact or lightly simplified keyword on:
- 京东
- 拼多多
- 唯品会
- 4. Stay in browser-driven flows only. Do not call site APIs, hidden JSON endpoints, app-only interfaces, or unofficial scrapers.
- Extract the top relevant visible results from each site.
- Prefer listings that match the same brand, model, spec, size, quantity, and packaging.
- Score comparability first, then judge price.
- End with a concrete recommendation: buy on which platform, wait, or avoid for now.
Input Rules
Require a product name as input.
Prefer one of these inputs:
- - precise product name
- Taobao listing title
- brand + model + spec
- product name plus intended use, if there are multiple variants
If the product name is too broad, ask one short follow-up to narrow it, for example:
- - brand
- model
- size/specification
- package count
- flavor/color/version
Good inputs:
- - INLINECODE6
- INLINECODE7
- INLINECODE8
Weak inputs that need clarification:
- - INLINECODE9
- INLINECODE10
- INLINECODE11
If the user pastes a very long Taobao title, do not ask them to rewrite it unless it is truly ambiguous. You should clean and normalize it yourself first.
Browser Execution Rules
- - Prefer the isolated OpenClaw browser unless the user explicitly asks to use their Chrome tab.
- Start with one tab per site when practical.
- Re-snapshot after navigation or major DOM changes.
- If a site shows login walls, anti-bot interstitials, region prompts, or app-download overlays, use the visible web result if possible and mention the limitation.
- If a site blocks access completely, report it instead of trying to bypass it.
- Do not fabricate missing prices.
- Prefer visible search/listing pages over deep product pages when one platform is unstable.
- Capture enough evidence to justify the recommendation, not just enough to fill a table.
Search Targets
Use the standard web search pages when possible:
- - 京东: search for the product name on jd.com
- 拼多多: search for the product name on pinduoduo.com or the visible web listing/search experience available in browser
- 唯品会: search for the product name on vip.com
If direct site search is unstable in browser, use a public search engine query constrained to the site, then open the most relevant visible result. Example pattern:
- - INLINECODE12
- INLINECODE13
- INLINECODE14
Still use browser navigation for the actual evidence collection.
Matching Rules
Treat listings as comparable only when the core attributes align.
Check, in order:
- 1. Brand
- Product line / model
- Variant
- Size / weight / count
- Seller type if obvious (official flagship, self-operated, marketplace seller)
If there is no close match on a platform:
- - say INLINECODE15
- optionally include the nearest visible alternative, clearly labeled as INLINECODE16
Decision Rules
Use this order of judgment:
- 1. Is it the same item or only a near match
- Is the visible price directly comparable
- Is the seller/store trust level similar
- Are coupon, membership, subsidy, or group-buy conditions required
- Are shipping speed and after-sales meaningfully different
Never recommend a cheaper platform when the cheaper listing is only cheaper because of:
- - lower specification
- different quantity or packaging
- unclear seller trust
- member-only or coupon-after price not available to most users
- group-buy requirement the user may not want
What To Capture Per Site
Capture only information visible on the page. Prefer the first 1-3 relevant results.
For each selected listing, collect when visible:
- - platform
- title
- displayed price
- promo/discount wording
- package/specification
- store/seller name
- delivery or shipping note
- URL
- confidence: high / medium / low
- note about why it matches or why it is only approximate
Also capture, when visible and relevant:
- - official/self-operated/flagship indicator
- coupon or subsidy dependency
- group-buy requirement
- delivery speed or shipping promise
- return or authenticity guarantee
Output Format
Return a decision first, then the evidence table.
Start with a short verdict block:
- - INLINECODE17
- INLINECODE18
- INLINECODE19
- INLINECODE20
- INLINECODE21
Then return a concise comparison table and short notes.
Use a table like this:
| 平台 | 商品标题 | 价格 | 规格/版本 | 店铺 | 匹配度 | 备注 |
|---|
| 京东 | ... | ¥... | ... | ... | 高 | 同品牌同规格 |
| 拼多多 |
... | ¥... | ... | ... | 中 | 规格接近,包装不同 |
| 唯品会 | ... | ¥... | ... | ... | 低 | 仅找到近似款 |
Then add:
- -
最低可见价 and platform - INLINECODE23 : high / medium / low
- INLINECODE24 : differences in package, seller, promo timing, membership price, shipping, or coupon requirements
- INLINECODE25 : 直接买 / 可等等 / 只建议在某平台买 / 暂不建议下单
Interpretation Rules
- - Do not claim a platform is cheaper unless the compared items are materially comparable.
- Separate
标价 from coupon-after price when the page makes that distinction. - Mention when a price may depend on membership, flash sale, subsidy, or region.
- If search results are noisy, prefer accuracy over completeness.
- If Taobao is not actually the best option, say so directly.
- If none of the results are truly comparable, explicitly say
当前不适合做强结论. - If the user seems purchase-ready, optimize the answer for actionability: where to buy, what to verify before paying, and what tradeoff they are accepting.
Example Requests
- - INLINECODE28
- INLINECODE29
- INLINECODE30
- INLINECODE31
- INLINECODE32
- INLINECODE33
Failure Handling
If one or more sites cannot be accessed or searched reliably, still return a partial result and list:
- - which site failed
- what was attempted
- whether the failure was due to login wall, anti-bot page, timeout, or missing web search results
If the evidence is partial, downgrade the recommendation strength:
- - INLINECODE34
- INLINECODE35
- INLINECODE36
- INLINECODE37
Resource
- - Read
references/site-notes.md when you need execution reminders for JD, Pinduoduo, and Vipshop search behavior and evidence standards.
淘宝竞品分析器
使用浏览器工具,将淘宝商品与京东、拼多多、唯品会上相同或最接近的商品进行对比。根据商品名称,收集可见的商品信息,并返回一份包含价格证据、匹配度、购买建议和风险提示的简洁对比报告。
该技能的实用之处:
- - 对比可比的商品,而非追逐误导性的低价。
- 解释较低的价格是否依赖于优惠券、会员、补贴或拼团。
- 最终给出明确的买/等/避开建议,而非仅仅一张表格。
使用时机
当用户实际在问以下问题时,使用此技能:
- - 这件淘宝商品别的平台多少钱
- 有没有同款或更划算的平台
- 京东 / 拼多多 / 唯品会 哪个更值得买
- 这几个平台价格差这么多正常吗
- 帮我做一个同款比价和购买建议
该技能应优化购买决策,而非原始数据收集。
购物矩阵
该技能是购物矩阵中的跨平台对比节点。
当任务更具体时,优先使用相近技能:
- - taobao-shopping:仅限淘宝的商品列表和卖家评估
- jd-shopping:以信任优先的自营购买
- pdd-shopping:以低价和补贴优先的购买
- tianmao:以旗舰店和正品优先的购买
- vip:以品牌折扣和限时抢购优先的购买
- alibaba-shopping:当用户需要先在淘宝、天猫和1688之间做出选择时
工作流程
- 1. 标准化输入的商品名称。
- 如果输入仅为淘宝风格的长标题,将其压缩为最小的可搜索核心:
- 品牌
- 型号/系列
- 尺寸/规格/数量
- 关键变体
- 3. 在以下平台搜索精确或略微简化的关键词:
- 京东
- 拼多多
- 唯品会
- 4. 仅使用浏览器驱动流程。不调用网站API、隐藏的JSON端点、仅限应用的接口或非官方爬虫。
- 从每个网站提取最相关的可见结果。
- 优先匹配相同品牌、型号、规格、尺寸、数量和包装的商品。
- 先评估可比性,再判断价格。
- 最终给出具体建议:在哪个平台购买、等待,或暂时避开。
输入规则
需要输入商品名称。
优先接受以下输入之一:
- - 精确的商品名称
- 淘宝商品标题
- 品牌 + 型号 + 规格
- 商品名称及预期用途(如有多个变体)
如果商品名称过于宽泛,提出一个简短的问题以缩小范围,例如:
好的输入示例:
- - Apple AirPods Pro 2
- 维达抽纸 3层 100抽 24包
- 耐克 Air Zoom Pegasus 41 男款
需要澄清的弱输入示例:
如果用户粘贴了非常长的淘宝标题,除非确实存在歧义,否则不要要求他们重写。您应自行清理和标准化。
浏览器执行规则
- - 优先使用隔离的OpenClaw浏览器,除非用户明确要求使用其Chrome标签页。
- 在可行的情况下,每个网站使用一个标签页。
- 导航或重大DOM变化后重新截图。
- 如果网站显示登录墙、反机器人拦截、地区提示或应用下载弹窗,尽可能使用可见的网页结果,并说明限制。
- 如果网站完全阻止访问,报告此情况,而非尝试绕过。
- 不要捏造缺失的价格。
- 当一个平台不稳定时,优先使用可见的搜索/列表页面,而非深层商品页面。
- 收集足够的证据以证明建议的合理性,而非仅仅填满表格。
搜索目标
尽可能使用标准的网页搜索页面:
- - 京东:在jd.com上搜索商品名称
- 拼多多:在pinduoduo.com上搜索商品名称,或使用浏览器中可见的网页列表/搜索体验
- 唯品会:在vip.com上搜索商品名称
如果直接在网站上搜索在浏览器中不稳定,使用限定于该网站的公共搜索引擎查询,然后打开最相关的可见结果。示例模式:
- - site:jd.com 商品名
- site:pinduoduo.com 商品名
- site:vip.com 商品名
仍使用浏览器导航进行实际的证据收集。
匹配规则
仅当核心属性一致时,才将商品视为可比较。
按顺序检查:
- 1. 品牌
- 产品线/型号
- 变体
- 尺寸/重量/数量
- 卖家类型(如明显:官方旗舰店、自营、市场卖家)
如果某个平台上没有接近的匹配:
- - 说明未找到足够接近的同款
- 可选地包含最近的可见替代品,并明确标注为近似款
决策规则
使用以下判断顺序:
- 1. 是否为相同商品或仅为近似匹配
- 可见价格是否可直接比较
- 卖家/店铺的信任度是否相似
- 是否需要优惠券、会员、补贴或拼团条件
- 配送速度和售后服务是否有显著差异
切勿推荐更便宜的平台,如果该更便宜的商品仅因以下原因而更便宜:
- - 规格较低
- 数量或包装不同
- 卖家信任度不明确
- 仅限会员或优惠券后价格,大多数用户无法享受
- 用户可能不想要的拼团要求
每个网站需捕获的信息
仅捕获页面上可见的信息。优先选择前1-3个相关结果。
对于每个选定的商品,收集可见的信息:
- - 平台
- 标题
- 显示价格
- 促销/折扣说明
- 包装/规格
- 店铺/卖家名称
- 配送或物流说明
- URL
- 置信度:高 / 中 / 低
- 关于匹配原因或仅为近似匹配的说明
同时捕获(如可见且相关):
- - 官方/自营/旗舰店标识
- 优惠券或补贴依赖
- 拼团要求
- 配送速度或物流承诺
- 退换货或正品保障
输出格式
先返回决策,然后是证据表格。
以简短的结论块开头:
- - 推荐平台
- 最低可见可比价
- 值不值得换平台
- 主要原因
- 风险点
然后返回简洁的对比表格和简短说明。
使用如下表格:
| 平台 | 商品标题 | 价格 | 规格/版本 | 店铺 | 匹配度 | 备注 |
|---|
| 京东 | ... | ¥... | ... | ... | 高 | 同品牌同规格 |
| 拼多多 |
... | ¥... | ... | ... | 中 | 规格接近,包装不同 |
| 唯品会 | ... | ¥... | ... | ... | 低 | 仅找到近似款 |
然后添加:
- - 最低可见价 及平台
- 可比性判断:高 / 中 / 低
- 风险提示:包装、卖家、促销时机、会员价、配送或优惠券要求的差异
- 购买建议:直接买 / 可等等 / 只建议在某平台买 / 暂不建议下单
解释规则
- - 除非比较的商品在实质上具有可比性,否则不要声称某个平台更便宜。
- 当页面区分标价和优惠券后价格时,将两者分开说明。
- 当价格可能依赖于会员、限时抢购、补贴或地区时,予以说明。
- 如果搜索结果杂乱,优先准确性而非完整性。
- 如果淘宝实际上并非最佳选择,直接说明。
- 如果所有结果均不具有真正的可比性,明确说明当前不适合做强结论。
- 如果用户似乎已准备好购买,优化答案以提供可操作性:在哪里购买、付款前需验证什么、以及他们正在接受何种权衡。
示例请求
- - 帮我查一下德芙黑巧克力 84g在京东、拼多多、唯品会的价格
- 对比一下iPhone 16 Pro 256GB在几个平台上的可见报价
- 把这个淘宝商品名拿去京东、拼多多、唯品会搜同款,做个价格表
- 这个淘宝商品有没有更便宜但靠谱的平台
- 帮我判断这件商品有没有必要从淘宝换到京东买
- 别只比价,也告诉我哪个平台更值得下单
失败处理
如果一个或多个网站无法访问或可靠搜索,仍返回部分结果,并列出:
- - 哪个网站失败
- 尝试了何种操作
- 失败原因:登录墙、反机器人页面、超时、或缺少网页搜索结果
如果证据不完整,降低推荐强度:
资源
- - 当需要京东、拼多多和唯品会搜索行为及证据标准的执行提醒时,请阅读 references/site-notes.md。