Technology Stack Evaluator
Evaluate and compare technologies, frameworks, and cloud providers with data-driven analysis and actionable recommendations.
Table of Contents
Capabilities
| Capability | Description |
|---|
| Technology Comparison | Compare frameworks and libraries with weighted scoring |
| TCO Analysis |
Calculate 5-year total cost including hidden costs |
| Ecosystem Health | Assess GitHub metrics, npm adoption, community strength |
| Security Assessment | Evaluate vulnerabilities and compliance readiness |
| Migration Analysis | Estimate effort, risks, and timeline for migrations |
| Cloud Comparison | Compare AWS, Azure, GCP for specific workloads |
Quick Start
Compare Two Technologies
CODEBLOCK0
Calculate TCO
CODEBLOCK1
Assess Migration
CODEBLOCK2
Input Formats
The evaluator accepts three input formats:
Text - Natural language queries
CODEBLOCK3
YAML - Structured input for automation
CODEBLOCK4
JSON - Programmatic integration
{
"technologies": ["React", "Vue"],
"use_case": "SaaS dashboard"
}
Analysis Types
Quick Comparison (200-300 tokens)
- - Weighted scores and recommendation
- Top 3 decision factors
- Confidence level
Standard Analysis (500-800 tokens)
- - Comparison matrix
- TCO overview
- Security summary
Full Report (1200-1500 tokens)
- - All metrics and calculations
- Migration analysis
- Detailed recommendations
Scripts
stack_comparator.py
Compare technologies with customizable weighted criteria.
CODEBLOCK6
tco_calculator.py
Calculate total cost of ownership over multi-year projections.
CODEBLOCK7
ecosystem_analyzer.py
Analyze ecosystem health from GitHub, npm, and community metrics.
CODEBLOCK8
security_assessor.py
Evaluate security posture and compliance readiness.
CODEBLOCK9
migration_analyzer.py
Estimate migration complexity, effort, and risks.
CODEBLOCK10
References
| Document | Content |
|---|
| INLINECODE0 | Detailed scoring algorithms and calculation formulas |
| INLINECODE1 |
Input/output examples for all analysis types |
|
references/workflows.md | Step-by-step evaluation workflows |
Confidence Levels
| Level | Score | Interpretation |
|---|
| High | 80-100% | Clear winner, strong data |
| Medium |
50-79% | Trade-offs present, moderate uncertainty |
| Low | < 50% | Close call, limited data |
When to Use
- - Comparing frontend/backend frameworks for new projects
- Evaluating cloud providers for specific workloads
- Planning technology migrations with risk assessment
- Calculating build vs. buy decisions with TCO
- Assessing open-source library viability
When NOT to Use
- - Trivial decisions between similar tools (use team preference)
- Mandated technology choices (decision already made)
- Emergency production issues (use monitoring tools)
技术栈评估器
通过数据驱动的分析和可操作的建议,评估和比较技术、框架及云服务提供商。
目录
能力
| 能力 | 描述 |
|---|
| 技术比较 | 使用加权评分比较框架和库 |
| 总拥有成本分析 |
计算5年总成本,包括隐性成本 |
| 生态系统健康度 | 评估GitHub指标、npm采用率、社区活跃度 |
| 安全评估 | 评估漏洞和合规准备情况 |
| 迁移分析 | 估算迁移的工作量、风险和周期 |
| 云服务比较 | 针对特定工作负载比较AWS、Azure、GCP |
快速开始
比较两种技术
比较React与Vue用于SaaS仪表盘。
优先级:开发者生产力(40%)、生态系统(30%)、性能(30%)。
计算总拥有成本
计算Next.js在Vercel上的5年总拥有成本。
团队:8名开发者。托管费用:2500美元/月。增长率:40%/年。
评估迁移
评估从Angular.js迁移到React。
代码库:50,000行,200个组件。团队:6名开发者。
输入格式
评估器接受三种输入格式:
文本 - 自然语言查询
比较PostgreSQL与MongoDB用于我们的电商平台。
YAML - 结构化输入用于自动化
yaml
comparison:
technologies: [React, Vue]
use_case: SaaS仪表盘
weights:
ecosystem: 30
performance: 25
developer_experience: 45
JSON - 程序化集成
json
{
technologies: [React, Vue],
use_case: SaaS仪表盘
}
分析类型
快速比较(200-300个token)
标准分析(500-800个token)
完整报告(1200-1500个token)
脚本
stack_comparator.py
使用可自定义的加权标准比较技术。
bash
python scripts/stack_comparator.py --help
tco_calculator.py
计算多年预测中的总拥有成本。
bash
python scripts/tcocalculator.py --input assets/sampleinput_tco.json
ecosystem_analyzer.py
分析来自GitHub、npm和社区指标的生态系统健康度。
bash
python scripts/ecosystem_analyzer.py --technology react
security_assessor.py
评估安全态势和合规准备情况。
bash
python scripts/security_assessor.py --technology express --compliance soc2,gdpr
migration_analyzer.py
估算迁移的复杂性、工作量和风险。
bash
python scripts/migration_analyzer.py --from angular-1.x --to react
参考资料
| 文档 | 内容 |
|---|
| references/metrics.md | 详细的评分算法和计算公式 |
| references/examples.md |
所有分析类型的输入/输出示例 |
| references/workflows.md | 逐步评估工作流程 |
置信度等级
50-79% | 存在权衡,中等不确定性 |
| 低 | < 50% | 难分伯仲,数据有限 |
适用场景
- - 为新项目比较前端/后端框架
- 针对特定工作负载评估云服务提供商
- 规划技术迁移并进行风险评估
- 通过总拥有成本计算构建与购买的决策
- 评估开源库的可行性
不适用场景
- - 相似工具间的琐碎决策(使用团队偏好)
- 已强制要求的技术选择(决策已定)
- 紧急生产问题(使用监控工具)