TikTok Content Creation Compliance
Overview
Classify TikTok Shop promotional content as Permitted, Risky - revise, Prohibited, or Unclear - verify live policy. This skill applies to both sellers promoting their own products and creators promoting products for others, including affiliate creator workflows.
Use the official policy summary in references/policy-summary.md as the starting point, and stay conservative when a claim, visual, product anchor, promotion mechanic, or edit could mislead users.
If the user asks for the latest or current rule, reopen the official URLs in the reference file before giving a final answer. TikTok Shop policy guidance changes over time.
Source hierarchy and dedupe
Use references/policy-summary.md as the canonical rule map, not as a page-by-page dump.
When multiple TikTok Shop pages repeat the same idea:
- - prefer the most specific policy page as the primary source
- use broader "best practices" or "policy pro" pages as reinforcement, examples, or clarifications
- summarize repeated rules once instead of restating them under multiple headings
- if two pages appear to conflict, prefer the newer and more specific page, then mark the case
Unclear - verify live policy if the conflict is still unresolved
Practical order of authority:
- 1. Product-category, health, AI, giveaway, gambling, platform-safety, and affiliate-eligibility pages
- Core content-policy and enforcement pages
- "Best Practices", "Creating with Impact", "Avoid Misleading Content", beauty and skincare guidance, and other "Become a Policy Pro" explainer pages
Review Workflow
1. Identify the artifact
Determine what you are reviewing:
- - video concept
- script
- shot list
- caption
- product claims
- editing plan
- finished video description
- exported video file
- product listing image or PDP image
Also determine the promotion context:
- - seller promoting own product
- creator promoting own shop product
- affiliate creator promoting another seller's product
- creator asking whether they are even eligible to promote the selected category
If the user only provides a rough idea, infer the missing structure and review the idea anyway.
If the user provides a video file, inspect the actual media instead of relying only on the script or filename. Prefer:
- - video metadata such as duration, aspect ratio, and subtitle tracks
- sampled frames across the full runtime
- on-screen text or subtitle extraction when available
- comparison against the linked product image or listing media
2. Check the highest-risk areas first
Review in this order:
- 1. Product-category or affiliate eligibility limits
- Health, wellness, medical, fertility, pregnancy, sexual wellness, weight-loss, or muscle-gain claims
- AI-generated or AI-edited people, product visuals, disclosures, or expert personas
- Misleading product presentation, unrealistic effects, before-and-after logic, or exaggerated promises
- Still-frame, low-quality, pre-recorded, or non-interactive video or LIVE formats
- Gambling, giveaway, or purchase-incentive mechanics
- Off-platform traffic redirects, IP, counterfeit, knockoff, or unoriginal-content risks
- Nudity, sexualized behavior, minors, violence, harassment, or shocking-content issues
Load references/policy-summary.md before deciding.
If the user is working from a creator education page, treat that page as a shortcut into the relevant canonical rule. Do not overcount duplicate warnings just because the same issue appears in several training pages.
When reviewing a finished video, explicitly check:
- - whether the shown package, bottle count, size, colorway, or bundle format matches the listing image
- whether watermarks from external tools, stock platforms, or AI systems are visible
- whether the edit appears fully AI-generated or significantly AI-edited, triggering disclosure review
- whether subtitles or dialogue add claims that are weaker or stronger than the visuals
3. Produce a policy verdict
Use exactly one primary verdict:
- - INLINECODE5
- INLINECODE6
- INLINECODE7
- INLINECODE8
For every flagged issue, name:
- - the risky claim, visual, or edit
- why it is risky
- the matching policy section from the reference file
- the official source URL
4. Rewrite toward compliance
When revising content:
- - replace hard promises with neutral, support-style wording
- align every claim with the actual listing, packaging, and product capabilities
- remove any fake authority signals, miracle framing, or fear tactics
- suggest AI disclosure when content is fully AI-generated or significantly AI-edited
- remove off-platform redirects, random-chance mechanics, or fake scarcity hooks
- ensure the product anchor actually matches the shown product
- keep product demos factual and product-focused
Do not claim content is safe if the policy signal is mixed. Mark it Risky - revise or Unclear - verify live policy.
Output Format
Return reviews in this structure:
CODEBLOCK0
Boundaries
- - Treat this skill as TikTok Shop guidance, not universal advice for all TikTok content.
- Treat the official Seller University pages as the source of truth for this skill.
- Distinguish between pages that explicitly apply to both sellers and creators and pages that are creator-specific but still relevant to creator-side promotions.
- Do not give legal or regulatory advice; flag when FDA, FTC, or similar review may be needed.
- If the user asks about non-TikTok-Shop platform rules, verify a broader official TikTok source before answering.
TikTok内容创作合规
概述
将TikTok Shop推广内容分类为允许、有风险 - 需修改、禁止或不明确 - 需核实现行政策。此技能适用于销售自有产品的卖家以及为他人推广产品的创作者,包括联盟创作者工作流程。
以参考资料/政策摘要.md中的官方政策摘要为起点,当某个声明、视觉元素、产品锚点、推广机制或剪辑可能误导用户时,保持保守判断。
如果用户询问最新或现行规则,在给出最终答案前重新打开参考文件中的官方URL。TikTok Shop政策指引会随时间变化。
来源层级与去重
使用参考资料/政策摘要.md作为规范规则图谱,而非逐页转储。
当多个TikTok Shop页面重复相同观点时:
- - 优先选择最具体的政策页面作为主要来源
- 使用更广泛的最佳实践或政策专家页面作为补充、示例或说明
- 将重复规则总结一次,而非在多个标题下重复陈述
- 如果两个页面似乎存在冲突,优先选择更新且更具体的页面,若冲突仍未解决,则标记为不明确 - 需核实现行政策
实际权威顺序:
- 1. 产品类别、健康、人工智能、赠品、赌博、平台安全及联盟资格页面
- 核心内容政策与执行页面
- 最佳实践、创造影响力、避免误导性内容、美容护肤指南及其他成为政策专家解释性页面
审核工作流程
1. 识别审核对象
确定您正在审核的内容:
- - 视频概念
- 脚本
- 镜头列表
- 字幕
- 产品声明
- 剪辑方案
- 成品视频描述
- 导出的视频文件
- 产品列表图片或产品详情页图片
同时确定推广背景:
- - 卖家推广自有产品
- 创作者推广自有店铺产品
- 联盟创作者推广其他卖家的产品
- 创作者询问其是否有资格推广所选类别
如果用户仅提供粗略想法,推断缺失结构并仍对想法进行审核。
如果用户提供视频文件,检查实际媒体内容而非仅依赖脚本或文件名。优先考虑:
- - 视频元数据,如时长、宽高比和字幕轨道
- 在整个播放时长内采样的帧画面
- 屏幕文字或字幕提取(如可用)
- 与链接产品图片或列表媒体的对比
2. 首先检查最高风险领域
按此顺序审核:
- 1. 产品类别或联盟资格限制
- 健康、保健、医疗、生育、怀孕、性健康、减肥或增肌声明
- 人工智能生成或人工智能编辑的人物、产品视觉、披露信息或专家形象
- 误导性产品展示、不切实际的效果、前后对比逻辑或夸大承诺
- 静态帧、低质量、预录制或非互动视频或直播格式
- 赌博、赠品或购买激励机制
- 平台外流量重定向、知识产权、仿冒品、山寨品或非原创内容风险
- 裸露、色情行为、未成年人、暴力、骚扰或令人震惊的内容问题
在做出决定前加载参考资料/政策摘要.md。
如果用户从创作者教育页面入手,将该页面视为进入相关规范规则的快捷方式。不要因同一问题出现在多个培训页面中而重复计算重复警告。
审核成品视频时,明确检查:
- - 展示的包装、瓶数、尺寸、配色或套装格式是否与列表图片匹配
- 外部工具、素材平台或人工智能系统的水印是否可见
- 剪辑是否完全由人工智能生成或经过大量人工智能编辑,触发披露审查
- 字幕或对话是否添加了比视觉元素更弱或更强的声明
3. 给出政策裁决
仅使用一个主要裁决:
- - 允许
- 有风险 - 需修改
- 禁止
- 不明确 - 需核实现行政策
对于每个标记的问题,说明:
- - 有风险的声明、视觉元素或剪辑
- 为何存在风险
- 参考文件中匹配的政策章节
- 官方来源URL
4. 修改至合规
修改内容时:
- - 将硬性承诺替换为中性、支持性措辞
- 使每项声明与实际列表、包装和产品能力保持一致
- 移除任何虚假权威信号、奇迹框架或恐惧策略
- 当内容完全由人工智能生成或经过大量人工智能编辑时,建议进行人工智能披露
- 移除平台外重定向、随机机会机制或虚假稀缺钩子
- 确保产品锚点与实际展示的产品匹配
- 保持产品演示基于事实且以产品为中心
如果政策信号不明确,不要声称内容安全。将其标记为有风险 - 需修改或不明确 - 需核实现行政策。
输出格式
按此结构返回审核结果:
text
裁决:<允许 | 有风险 - 需修改 | 禁止 | 不明确 - 需核实现行政策>
原因:
标记项:
更安全的改写:
待解决问题:
边界
- - 将此技能视为TikTok Shop指南,而非适用于所有TikTok内容的通用建议。
- 将官方卖家大学页面视为此技能的权威来源。
- 区分明确适用于卖家和创作者的页面,以及仅适用于创作者但与创作者侧推广相关的页面。
- 不提供法律或监管建议;在可能需要FDA、FTC或类似审查时进行标记。
- 如果用户询问非TikTok Shop平台规则,在回答前核实更广泛的官方TikTok来源。