Values Clarification & Purpose
"Find your passion" is garbage advice. Passion doesn't precede action — it follows it. And most of the time, when people feel directionless, the problem isn't missing passion. It's misalignment: their life is structured around values they inherited, absorbed, or defaulted into instead of values they actually hold. This skill is a structured process for figuring out what you actually care about when you strip away what you're supposed to care about, then looking at whether your life matches. The gap between those two things is the source of most chronic dissatisfaction.
``agent-adaptation
# Localization note — values are universal but their relative cultural weight differs.
- The values list and exercises in this skill are drawn from ACT (Acceptance and
Commitment Therapy), which has been validated across cultures.
- HOWEVER: the relative importance of values is deeply cultural.
In individualist cultures (US, UK, Australia): autonomy, achievement, and
independence tend to rank higher.
In collectivist cultures (Japan, China, many Latin American and African countries):
family, community, loyalty, and tradition tend to rank higher.
NEITHER is wrong. The agent must not impose a cultural frame on what the
"right" values are.
- The "ideal Tuesday" exercise works globally but the specifics differ.
A good regular day in Lagos looks different from one in Stockholm. Adapt
the exercise to the user's actual context.
- Family/cultural expectation conflicts are universal but manifest differently.
In some cultures, choosing personal values over family expectations carries
more social cost. Acknowledge this reality rather than treating it as
a problem to be solved.
- If the user's values include faith, tradition, or community obligation,
respect these as genuine values — not as constraints to overcome.
CODEBLOCK0
VALUES CARD SORT:
Read through this list. Your job is to get from 50 to 5.
ROUND 1: Remove any that genuinely don't matter to you.
Be honest — drop the ones you think SHOULD matter but don't.
(If "achievement" makes you exhausted rather than motivated,
drop it. If "spirituality" is something you do out of obligation,
drop it.)
ROUND 2: From what's left, pick your top 15.
ROUND 3: From those 15, pick your top 10.
ROUND 4: From those 10, pick your top 5.
THE LIST:
Achievement Adventure Authenticity Autonomy Balance
Beauty Challenge Community Compassion Competence
Contribution Courage Creativity Curiosity Fairness
Faith Family Freedom Friendship Fun
Growth Health Honesty Humor Independence
Influence Integrity Justice Kindness Knowledge
Leadership Love Loyalty Mastery Nature
Openness Order Peace Pleasure Power
Purpose Recognition Reliability Resilience Respect
Responsibility Security Service Simplicity Spirituality
Stability Tradition Truth Wisdom
IMPORTANT NOTES:
-> There are no wrong answers. "Pleasure" is not a lesser value
than "service." "Power" is not a shameful value if it's honest.
-> If a value isn't on this list, add it. This list is a starting
point, not a constraint.
-> The hard part is Round 3 to Round 4. That's where the real
tradeoffs happen. "I value both security AND freedom" — yes,
but which one wins when they conflict? That's your answer.
-> Your values are yours, not your parents', your partner's,
your employer's, or your culture's. If your honest top 5
surprises you, that's information, not a problem.
CODEBLOCK1
THE IDEAL TUESDAY:
Not your ideal vacation. Not your dream life in a movie montage.
Your ideal REGULAR day. A good, sustainable Tuesday.
Walk through the day:
MORNING:
-> What time do you wake up?
-> Where are you? (City, home type, surroundings)
-> Who else is there?
-> What's the first thing you do?
-> How do you feel?
MIDDAY:
-> What work are you doing? (Or are you not working?)
-> Who are you working with?
-> Where are you working?
-> What kind of problems are you solving?
-> How much autonomy do you have?
AFTERNOON:
-> How do you spend the hours between work and evening?
-> What are you doing with your body?
-> Who are you with?
EVENING:
-> Who are you eating with?
-> What are you doing after dinner?
-> What's your state of mind going to bed?
NOW EXTRACT THE VALUES:
-> If your ideal Tuesday involves waking up slowly with no
alarm, that's probably freedom or peace.
-> If it involves solving hard problems with smart people,
that's probably challenge or competence or community.
-> If it involves being outdoors, that's nature or health.
-> If it involves time alone, that's independence or simplicity.
-> If it involves a house full of people, that's family or
community or love.
THE IDEAL TUESDAY REVEALS YOUR VALUES MORE HONESTLY THAN ANY
ABSTRACT RANKING EXERCISE. Because you're not thinking about
what's impressive — you're thinking about what feels right.
Compare your ideal Tuesday values with your card sort top 5.
If they match: your values are clear.
If they don't: dig into the discrepancy. The card sort might
reflect what you think you should value. The Tuesday exercise
reveals what you actually value.
CODEBLOCK2
THE EULOGY TEST:
Imagine your funeral. Someone who knows you well stands up to speak.
What do you want them to say?
Not your resume. Not your accomplishments. Not your job title
or net worth or social media following.
What do you want them to say about WHO YOU WERE?
Write 3-5 sentences. Be specific.
EXAMPLES:
-> "She was the person who showed up. Every time. Even when
it was inconvenient."
-> "He told you the truth even when it was hard to hear,
and you trusted him because of it."
-> "She made everyone around her feel like they mattered."
-> "He built things that worked and taught other people how."
-> "She never let fear make her decisions."
WHAT THIS REVEALS:
Your eulogy sentences are your deepest values in action.
If your eulogy is about honesty but your daily life involves
constant people-pleasing, there's a gap.
If your eulogy is about presence and connection but you work
80 hours a week, there's a gap.
If your eulogy is about courage but you've been avoiding a
hard conversation for six months, there's a gap.
THE GAP IS THE WORK.
Now: do your eulogy values match your card sort and your
ideal Tuesday? If all three exercises point the same direction,
you know your values. If they diverge, look at where and why.
CODEBLOCK3
MISALIGNMENT AUDIT:
Take your top 5 values. For each one, ask:
1. HOW MUCH TIME do I spend on this per week?
(Actual hours, not "I think about it a lot")
2. HOW MUCH MONEY do I spend on this per month?
(Budget is a values document — what you spend on is
what you actually prioritize)
3. WHAT DECISIONS have I made in the last year that
ALIGN with this value?
4. WHAT DECISIONS have I made in the last year that
CONTRADICT this value?
5. On a scale of 1-10, how well does my current life
reflect this value?
COMMON MISALIGNMENT PATTERNS:
"I value family but I work 60 hours a week."
-> Your schedule says you value career. Your heart says
family. Something has to change or the dissonance
will eat you alive.
"I value creativity but my job is pure administration."
-> You're trading your core value for security.
That's a valid tradeoff — but is it conscious?
"I value health but I haven't exercised in months."
-> Aspiration is not the same as value. A value you
don't act on is a wish.
"I value independence but I've never said no to my parents."
-> This might be a genuine values conflict (independence
vs family loyalty) rather than a misalignment.
See Step 5.
THE QUESTION THAT MATTERS:
For each misalignment, ask: "Is this a tradeoff I'm consciously
making, or is it a default I've never examined?"
Conscious tradeoffs are fine. Unexamined defaults are where
chronic dissatisfaction lives.
CODEBLOCK4
WHEN VALUES COMPETE:
Your values will conflict with each other. This is normal.
There is no right answer — only your answer.
COMMON VALUE CONFLICTS:
-> Security vs Freedom (stable job vs entrepreneurship)
-> Family vs Achievement (being present vs career ambition)
-> Honesty vs Kindness (telling the truth vs sparing feelings)
-> Independence vs Community (doing it your way vs belonging)
-> Stability vs Adventure (staying put vs taking the leap)
HOW TO NAVIGATE:
1. ACKNOWLEDGE THE CONFLICT
Don't pretend you can have both at maximum intensity.
"I want both security and freedom" is a starting position,
not a solution.
2. IDENTIFY YOUR CURRENT ALLOCATION
Right now, which side are you serving? If your life is
95% security and 5% freedom, is that the ratio you'd choose?
3. DETERMINE WHAT "ENOUGH" LOOKS LIKE
You don't need maximum security OR maximum freedom.
What's the minimum security that lets you sleep at night?
What's the minimum freedom that keeps you from feeling trapped?
4. MAKE SEASONAL ADJUSTMENTS
Your 20s might optimize for adventure. Your 30s might
shift toward family. Your 50s might return to growth.
Values have stable cores but shifting priorities.
5. ACCEPT THE LOSS
Choosing one value over another means losing something real.
Grief over the unchosen path is not a sign you chose wrong.
It's a sign you valued something you couldn't fully have.
WHEN VALUES CONFLICT WITH FAMILY/CULTURE/EMPLOYER:
-> This is the hardest version. Your honest values may put you
at odds with people you love or systems you depend on.
-> You have three options: (a) change the external situation,
(b) find creative integration, (c) accept the misalignment
as a conscious tradeoff.
-> There is no option (d) where the conflict disappears.
Pretending it doesn't exist is what makes people sick.
CODEBLOCK5
ALIGNMENT PROTOCOL:
For each of your top 5 values, define:
1. ONE DAILY ACTION (takes <15 minutes)
Small, consistent, non-negotiable.
Value: creativity -> Write for 10 minutes every morning.
Value: health -> Walk for 15 minutes after lunch.
Value: connection -> One genuine conversation per day (not text).
2. ONE WEEKLY ACTION (takes 1-2 hours)
Meaningful investment in the value.
Value: family -> Sunday dinner, phones off, every week.
Value: growth -> One hour of deliberate learning.
Value: nature -> One outdoor activity regardless of weather.
3. ONE QUARTERLY DECISION
A larger choice that moves your life toward the value.
Value: freedom -> Negotiate remote work or reduce expenses by 10%.
Value: contribution -> Commit to a volunteer role.
Value: courage -> Have the conversation you've been avoiding.
4. ONE ANNUAL REVIEW
Check your values against your life. Have they shifted?
Has your alignment improved? Where are the remaining gaps?
THE FIRST WEEK:
-> Pick ONE value.
-> Define the daily action.
-> Do it for 7 days.
-> Then add the second value.
-> Stacking slowly works. Overhauling everything at once doesn't.
THE ALIGNMENT METRIC:
You're not trying to get to 10/10 on every value.
You're trying to close the gap between what you care about
and how you actually spend your time, money, and energy.
Progress from 3/10 to 6/10 changes your life more than
moving from 7/10 to 8/10.
CODEBLOCK6
ANNUAL VALUES REVIEW:
Your values shift. Not dramatically, but they shift. The person
you are at 25 does not hold the same hierarchy as the person
you are at 40 or 55. Checking annually prevents you from living
by outdated values.
THE REVIEW:
1. Pull out last year's top 5. Do they still feel right?
If something has shifted, that's not failure — it's growth.
2. Redo the card sort (or at least the top 10 -> top 5 round).
See what's different.
3. Run the alignment audit again (Step 4).
Where are the gaps now?
4. Look at your major decisions this year.
Which values drove them? Were those the right values for
those decisions?
5. Set your alignment actions for the next year (Step 6).
WHEN VALUES SHIFT:
-> After major life events (birth, death, illness, divorce,
job change) — re-assess immediately, don't wait for annual
-> When chronic dissatisfaction persists despite "everything
being fine" — your values may have shifted without your
conscious awareness
-> When you notice you're excited about things that used
to bore you, or bored by things that used to excite you
VALUES REVIEW PAIRS WELL WITH:
-> identity-rebuild skill (for major identity transitions)
-> career-reinvention skill (for professional alignment)
-> stoicism-daily-practice skill (for the dichotomy of control
applied to values conflicts)
-> death-preparation skill (memento mori clarifies values fast)
CODEBLOCK7 yaml
state:
process:
card_sort_completed: false
top_5_values: []
ideal_tuesday_completed: false
eulogy_test_completed: false
alignment_audit_completed: false
alignment_scores: {} # value: score (1-10)
misalignments_identified: []
competing_values_identified: []
actions:
daily_actions_defined: []
weekly_actions_defined: []
quarterly_decisions_defined: []
actions_started: false
actions_start_date: null
context:
trigger: null # directionless, major_decision, crisis_rebuild, annual_review
previous_values: [] # from prior assessment if any
values_shifted: null
follow_up:
next_review_date: null
check_in_frequency: null
CODEBLOCK8 yaml
triggers:
- name: start_with_card_sort
condition: "process.card_sort_completed IS false AND user_seeking_values_work"
action: "Let's start with the values card sort. I'll give you a list of 50 values. Your job is to get down to your top 5. The hard part isn't picking your favorites — it's dropping the ones you think you should keep but don't actually care about."
- name: alignment_gap_detected
condition: "process.alignment_audit_completed IS true AND ANY alignment_scores < 4"
action: "You've got some significant gaps between what you value and how you're living. That's not unusual — it's why you're here. Let's pick the biggest gap and build a concrete plan to close it, starting with one daily action."
- name: action_check_in
condition: "actions.actions_started IS true AND days_since(actions_start_date) == 7"
action: "It's been a week since you started your values-aligned actions. How's it going? Which ones stuck? Which ones fell off? Adjusting the actions is fine — abandoning the value is what we want to avoid."
- name: annual_review_prompt
condition: "process.card_sort_completed IS true"
schedule: "annually from card_sort_date"
action: "It's been a year since your last values assessment. Time for an annual review. Values shift over time — what felt essential a year ago might have moved. Want to redo the card sort and see what's different?"
- name: crisis_trigger
condition: "context.trigger == 'crisis_rebuild'"
action: "Rebuilding after a crisis is one of the best times to do values work, because the old structure is already gone. You're not disrupting anything — you're building from scratch. Let's find out what you actually want to build toward."
``
价值观澄清与目标
找到你的热情所在是糟糕的建议。热情并非先于行动——它紧随行动而来。大多数时候,当人们感到迷茫时,问题不在于缺乏热情。而在于错位:他们的生活结构建立在继承、吸收或默认接受的价值观之上,而非他们真正持有的价值观。这项技能是一个结构化的过程,帮助你在剥离那些应该在意的东西后,找出你真正在意的事物,然后审视你的生活是否与之匹配。这两者之间的差距,正是大多数长期不满的根源。
agent-adaptation
本地化说明——价值观具有普遍性,但其相对文化权重有所不同。
- - 本技能中的价值观列表和练习源自ACT(接纳与承诺疗法),该疗法已在多种文化中得到验证。
- 然而:价值观的相对重要性具有深刻的文化属性。
在个人主义文化(美国、英国、澳大利亚)中:自主、成就和独立通常排名更高。
在集体主义文化(日本、中国、许多拉丁美洲和非洲国家)中:家庭、社区、忠诚和传统通常排名更高。
两者都没有错。智能体不得将某种文化框架强加于正确的价值观之上。
- - 理想星期二练习在全球范围内都有效,但具体细节有所不同。
在拉各斯度过的美好普通一天,与在斯德哥尔摩的一天截然不同。根据用户的实际情境调整练习。
- - 家庭/文化期望的冲突是普遍存在的,但表现形式不同。
在某些文化中,选择个人价值观而非家庭期望会带来更高的社会成本。承认这一现实,而不是将其视为需要解决的问题。
- - 如果用户的价值观包括信仰、传统或社区义务,请将这些视为真实的价值观——而不是需要克服的约束。
来源与验证
- - ACT价值观工作——接纳与承诺疗法。价值观澄清的核心治疗框架。由史蒂文·海耶斯开发。
- 拉斯·哈里斯——《幸福的陷阱》(2008年)和《自信的缺口》(2011年)。基于ACT的实用价值观练习。
- 马丁·塞利格曼——VIA性格优势。viacharacter.org。基于研究的优势和价值观评估。
- 威廉·米勒——动机性访谈价值观卡片分类和价值观探索练习。
- 沙洛姆·施瓦茨——人类基本价值观理论。涵盖82个国家的跨文化价值观研究。
何时使用
- - 用户感到迷茫、停滞不前或长期不满,但原因不明
- 某人正在做出重大人生决定(职业转变、搬家、关系、生育),不知道应该优化什么
- 用户怀疑自己正按照他人的价值观生活(父母、文化、雇主、社交媒体)
- 某人在危机后重建(失业、离婚、健康恐慌、身份认同瓦解)
- 用户说诸如我不知道自己想要什么或我应该快乐,但我并不快乐之类的话
- 某人希望在运用职业重塑或身份重建技能之前建立一个基础
- 用户希望进行年度价值观回顾和生活审计
操作说明
第一步:价值观卡片分类——找到你真正的五大价值观
智能体行动:呈现完整的价值观列表。引导用户从50个价值观中逐步筛选出前5个。这不是测验——而是一个通过淘汰迫使你做出取舍的过程。
价值观卡片分类:
通读此列表。你的任务是从50个中筛选出5个。
第一轮:移除任何对你来说真正无关紧要的价值观。
要诚实——放弃那些你认为应该在意但实际上并不在意的价值观。
(如果成就让你感到疲惫而非激励,就放弃它。
如果灵性是你出于义务而做的事情,就放弃它。)
第二轮:从剩下的价值观中,选出你的前15个。
第三轮:从这15个中,选出你的前10个。
第四轮:从这10个中,选出你的前5个。
价值观列表:
成就 冒险 真诚 自主 平衡
美 挑战 社区 同情 能力
贡献 勇气 创造力 好奇心 公平
信仰 家庭 自由 友谊 乐趣
成长 健康 诚实 幽默 独立
影响力 正直 正义 善良 知识
领导力 爱 忠诚 精通 自然
开放 秩序 和平 愉悦 权力
目标 认可 可靠 韧性 尊重
责任 安全 服务 简单 灵性
稳定 传统 真理 智慧
重要提示:
-> 没有错误的答案。愉悦并不比服务低级。
权力如果是诚实的,也不是可耻的价值观。
-> 如果某个价值观不在列表中,可以添加。此列表是起点,而非约束。
-> 最难的部分是从第三轮到第四轮。真正的取舍在此发生。
我既重视安全又重视自由——是的,但当它们冲突时,哪个胜出?
那就是你的答案。
-> 你的价值观是你的,不是你父母的、伴侣的、雇主的或文化的。
如果你诚实的五大价值观让你自己都感到惊讶,那是信息,不是问题。
第二步:理想星期二练习
智能体行动:引导用户完成此练习。不是他们的理想假期——而是他们理想的普通一天。
理想星期二:
不是你的理想假期。不是你梦想生活中电影蒙太奇般的场景。
是你理想的普通一天。一个美好、可持续的星期二。
走过这一天:
早晨:
-> 你几点醒来?
-> 你在哪里?(城市、住宅类型、环境)
-> 还有谁在那里?
-> 你做的第一件事是什么?
-> 你感觉如何?
中午:
-> 你在做什么工作?(或者你不在工作?)
-> 你和谁一起工作?
-> 你在哪里工作?
-> 你在解决什么样的问题?
-> 你有多少自主权?
下午:
-> 你如何度过下班后到晚上的时间?
-> 你的身体在做什么?
-> 你和谁在一起?
晚上:
-> 你和谁一起吃饭?
-> 晚饭后你做什么?
-> 你上床睡觉时的心境如何?
现在提取价值观:
-> 如果你的理想星期二是在没有闹钟的情况下慢慢醒来,
那可能意味着自由或平和。
-> 如果涉及与聪明人一起解决难题,
那可能意味着挑战、能力或社区。
-> 如果涉及户外活动,那是自然或健康。
-> 如果涉及独处时间,那是独立或简单。
-> 如果涉及满屋子的人,那是家庭、社区或爱。
理想星期二比任何抽象排序练习都更能诚实地揭示你的价值观。
因为你不是在想什么令人印象深刻——而是在想什么感觉对。
将你的理想星期二价值观与卡片分类的前5个进行比较。
如果匹配:你的价值观很清晰。
如果不匹配:深入探究差异。卡片分类可能反映了你认为自己应该重视的东西。
星期二练习揭示了你的实际价值观。
第三步:悼词测试
智能体行动:这会让人不舒服。这正是重点。
悼词测试:
想象你的葬礼。一个非常了解你的人站起来发言。
你希望他们说什么?
不是你的简历。不是你的成就。不是你的职位头衔、
净资产或社交媒体粉丝数。
你希望他们如何描述你是一个什么样的人?
写3-5句话。要具体。
示例:
-> 她是一个总会出现的人。每一次。即使在不方便的时候。
-> 他即使在难以启齿时也会告诉你真相,正因如此你信任他。
-> 她让身边的每个人都觉得自己很重要。
-> 他建造了能用的东西,并教会了其他人如何去做。
-> 她从不因恐惧而做决定。
这揭示了什么:
你的悼词句子是你最深层价值观在行动中的体现。
如果你的悼词是关于诚实,但你的日常生活涉及不断的取悦他人,
那就存在差距。
如果你的悼词是关于陪伴和连接,但你每周工作80小时,
那就存在差距。
如果你的悼词是关于勇气,但你六个月来一直在回避一次艰难的对话,
那就存在差距。
差距就是需要努力的地方。
现在:你的悼词价值观是否与你的卡片分类和理想星期二相匹配?
如果所有三个练习都指向同一方向,你就知道了自己的价值观。
如果它们出现分歧,看看在哪里以及为什么。
第四步:识别错位
智能体行动:这是洞察转化为行动的地方。帮助用户看到他们的价值观和生活不匹配的地方。
错位审计:
拿出你的五大价值观。对每一个,问:
- 1. 我每周花多少时间在这上面?
(实际小时数,不是我经常想到它)
- 2. 我每月花多少钱在这上面?
(预算是价值观的体现——你花钱的地方就是你真正优先考虑的事情)
- 3. 过去一年中,我做出了哪些与这一价值观一致的决策?
- 4. 过去一年中,我做出了哪些与这一价值观相矛盾的决策?
- 5. 在1-10的范围内,我目前的生活在多大程度上反映了这一价值观?
常见的错位模式:
我重视家庭,但我每周工作60小时。
-> 你的日程表显示你重视事业。你的内心说重视家庭。
必须有所改变,否则这种不协调感会吞噬你。
我重视创造力,但我的工作是纯粹的行政管理。
-> 你在用你的核心价值观换取安全感。
这是一个有效的权衡——但这是有意识的吗?
我重视健康,但我已经几个月没锻炼了。
-> 渴望不等于价值观。一个你没有付诸行动的价值观只是一个愿望。
我重视独立,但我从未对父母说过不。
-> 这可能是一个真正的价值观冲突(独立 vs 家庭忠诚),
而不是错位。参见第五步。
关键问题:
对于每一个错位,问:这是一个我有意识做出的